| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | S 10 R 361/15 | 12.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 7 R 132/16 | 22.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 59/19 B | 21.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 AL 215/15 | 19.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 485/16 | 16.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 1/20 R | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 15 SO 73/10 | 02.10.2013 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 7/14 | 13.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 3/19 R | 11.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 R 311/15 | 19.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 295/18 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 6/19 R | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 234/15 | 04.05.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 103/17 | 28.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/19 R | 06.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 U 348/17 | 28.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1806/18 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/19 R | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 2 KA 21/16 | 03.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 3 KA 4/16 | 12.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/19 R | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 646/17 | 14.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1034/18 | 12.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 9/20 R | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 17 AS 7/19 | 19.09.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 7/20 R | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 71 KA 306/11 | 22.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 56/15 | 12.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 10/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 7 SO 113/18 ER | 30.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 37/18 B ER | 31.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 AS 3860/19 | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2155/20 | 05.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 R 2010/17 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 3314/18 | 12.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 3421/20 | 12.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Januar 2021 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 38 KR 674/17 | 19.08.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 38 KR 674/17 | 19.08.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 EG 15/19 | 17.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 R 1164/11 | 14.06.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 1233/10 | 08.09.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 769/16 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 926/18 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 411/18 | 27.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 94/15 | 06.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 6/18 | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 17/14 | 08.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 40/16 | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 55/15 | 07.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 11/17 | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 1444/17 | 12.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 156/18 | 27.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 13 U 135/10 | 10.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 192/18 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 312 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 312 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 312 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 59/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-59-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-59-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 9/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-9-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-9-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 19/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-19-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-19-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 7/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-7-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-7-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 10/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-10-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-10-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 37/18 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-37-18-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-37-18-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2155/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2155-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2155-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 3314/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-3314-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:20:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:20:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-3314-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 3421/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-3421-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-3421-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KR 674/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-kr-674-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-kr-674-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KR 674/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-kr-674-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-kr-674-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 EG 15/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-eg-15-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-eg-15-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 1164/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-1164-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-1164-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 769/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-769-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-769-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 411/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-411-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-411-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 6/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-6-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-6-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 40/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-40-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-40-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 11/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-11-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-11-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 156/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-156-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-156-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 192/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-192-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-192-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 59/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-59-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-59-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2edff8cab37053bda146a7caf773e25d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d97d3df432e66fcb5c9e8b6eba5fe281:0.36296500 1751015194 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.