| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 V 5871/03 | 22.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 V 1195/05 | 24.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AL 1464/04 | 01.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 935/06 | 18.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 AL 3462/03 | 25.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AL 248/05 | 19.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 SB 4397/03 | 28.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 40/06 | 24.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 1 P 172/03 | 13.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 3351/04 | 27.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 AL 240/04 | 25.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2979/06 NZB | 20.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 AS 4463/05 AK-A | 22.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 2117/06 AK-B | 20.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1803/06 PKH-A | 25.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 RJ 2799/01 | 08.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1451/03 | 18.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 617/01 | 25.04.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 7/05 | 20.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 14 KA 59/02 | 12.01.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 29/05 | 09.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 109/03 | 24.05.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 39/05 | 11.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 242/03 | 02.04.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 9/04 | 20.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 45/06 ER | 14.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 338/04 | 21.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 168/05 | 13.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 91/03 | 17.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 144/03 | 20.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 27/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 378/06 | 18.07.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 347/06 | 18.07.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 289/06 | 18.07.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 RJ 896/03 | 09.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 ER 66/06 KA | 03.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 ER 130/06 KA | 20.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 25. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 33 AL 127/04 | 26.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 (12) AL 236/04 | 09.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 50/05 R | 20.10.2005 | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 25. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 RA 892/04 | 27.06.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 29 AS 1100/05 | 19.06.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 25. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 14 RJ 761/04 | 09.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 R 2048/05 | 20.07.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Juli 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3127 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3127 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3127 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78150, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 1195/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-1195-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-1195-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 935/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-935-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-935-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 248/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-248-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-248-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 40/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-40-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-40-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 3351/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-3351-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-3351-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2979/06 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2979-06-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2979-06-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 2117/06 AK-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-2117-06-ak-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-2117-06-ak-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1803/06 PKH-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1803-06-pkh-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1803-06-pkh-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1451/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1451-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1451-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 7/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-7-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-7-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 29/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-29-05-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-29-05-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 39/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-39-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-39-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 9/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-9-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-9-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 45/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-45-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-45-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 338/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-338-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-338-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 91/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-91-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-91-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 378/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-378-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-378-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 347/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-347-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-347-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 289/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-289-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-289-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 RJ 896/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-rj-896-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-rj-896-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 ER 130/06 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-er-130-06-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-er-130-06-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AL 127/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-al-127-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-al-127-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 RA 892/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ra-892-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ra-892-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 1100/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-1100-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-1100-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 2048/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-2048-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:15:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:15:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-2048-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 89018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 1195/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-1195-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:52:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:52:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-1195-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a51fd6e5307985e2a1cfe9180de9f763 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:23b1a504f7ff2631fddf0b37d62077c3:0.53621100 1757391537 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.