Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 97 R 4503/15 | 30.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 641/17 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 18/15 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 142/17 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 18/15 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 142/17 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 315/14 | 18.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 155/18 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/20 R | 29.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AL 17/17 | 08.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 38/18 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 40 AS 1486/20 ER | 25.08.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 726/20 B ER | 07.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 167/17 | 04.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 616/18 | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 1/21 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 R 211/17 | 13.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 14/20 | 25.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 2405/19 | 20.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 20. Januar 2021 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 296/18 | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 315/19 | 07.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 164/15 | 16.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 811/17 | 23.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 3218/20 ER | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1585/20 B ER | 02.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 R 1164/11 | 14.06.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 1083/16 WA | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 6/20 B | 09.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 R 714/19 | 01.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 322/20 | 20.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 1753/15 | 31.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 875/18 | 07.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/19 B | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SO 3012/19 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 838/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2637/20 ER | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. Januar 2021 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 2637/20 ER | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. Januar 2021 | ||
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 133/16 | 16.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 86/18 | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 6 EG 5/18 | 28.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 7/19 | 28.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/20 B | 05.11.2020 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 20. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AS 811/18 | 21.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 419/19 | 05.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 6 EG 5/18 | 28.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 7/19 | 28.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/20 B | 05.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 16/12 | 27.01.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 16/16 ZVW | 17.05.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 700/20 ER | 02.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 554/20 B ER | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2021 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 2538/15 | 19.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 832/17 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 313 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 313 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 313 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 641/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-641-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-641-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 142/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-142-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-142-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 142/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-142-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-142-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 155/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-155-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-155-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 38/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-38-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-38-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 726/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-726-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-726-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 616/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-616-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-616-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159359 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 223 KR 2405/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-223-kr-2405-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-223-kr-2405-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 315/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-315-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:15:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:15:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-315-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 811/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-811-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-811-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1585/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1585-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1585-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1083/16 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1083-16-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1083-16-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 322/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-322-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-322-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 875/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-875-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-875-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 3012/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-3012-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-3012-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2637/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2637-20-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2637-20-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2637/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2637-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2637-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 133/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-133-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-133-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 EG 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-eg-5-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-eg-5-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 419/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-419-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-419-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 16/16 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-16-16-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-16-16-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 554/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-554-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-554-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 832/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-832-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-832-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 641/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-641-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-641-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => af71c9e82ea8699426716672274105a6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e75ea62e726f5d9347e14ddaf2a188ab:0.91138200 1751043985 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.