| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 KR 2142/03 | 23.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3433/04 | 19.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 21/05 R | 04.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 AL 1647/99 | 24.11.1995 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1647/99 | 28.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 V 897/00 | 11.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 V 1912/01 | 13.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9a/9 V 8/03 R | 24.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 AL 2630/02 | 15.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 688/03 | 18.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KG 3201/99 | 25.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 KG 2689/02 | 23.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 1 RA 44/01 | 16.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 RA 69/03 | 06.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 55/04 R | 14.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 31 (14,12) AL 288/02 | 09.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 AL 107/03 | 21.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 1/05 R | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 1 AL 228/01 | 23.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 1/03 | 19.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 12/05 R | 20.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 3 KR 85/97 | 19.10.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 35/99 | 27.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 34/01 R | 03.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 Ar 47/95 | 11.07.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 Ar 21/97 | 24.06.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 31/99 R | 11.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 Ar 37/95 | 25.07.1995 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 Ar 427/95 | 27.02.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 61/97 R | 25.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 12 AS 1197/05 ER | 17.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 273/05 AS-ER | 31.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AL 456/02 | 08.07.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 201/03 | 01.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 RJ 419/00 | 27.09.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 635/01 | 16.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 AL 1829/99 | 04.04.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 207/00 | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 KA 2889/00 | 20.01.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 228/04 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 KA 115/99 | 20.03.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 KA 921/01 | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 44/03 R | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 114/02 | 05.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 114/05 | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 159/04 | 29.08.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 100/05 | 14.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 5 KR 40/98 | 30.11.1998 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 100/04 ZVW | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 79/04 | 26.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 12. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 55/06 | 20.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 55/06 | 20.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 15 KA 23/03 | 07.06.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 12. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RJ 517/02 | 09.08.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 12. Juli 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3139 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3433/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3433-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3433-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1647/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1647-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:38:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:38:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1647-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 1912/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-1912-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:33:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:33:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-1912-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 688/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-688-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:32:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:32:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-688-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KG 2689/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kg-2689-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:32:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:32:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kg-2689-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 55/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-55-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-55-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11a AL 1/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11a-al-1-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11a-al-1-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 12/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-12-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-12-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 34/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-34-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-34-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 31/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-31-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:45:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:45:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-31-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 61/97 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-61-97-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:45:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:45:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-61-97-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 273/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-273-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-273-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 201/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-201-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-201-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 635/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-635-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:04:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:04:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-635-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 207/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-207-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-207-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 228/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-228-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-228-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 44/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-44-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-44-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 114/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-114-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-114-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 100/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-100-05-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-100-05-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 100/04 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-100-04-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-100-04-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 79/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-79-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-79-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 55/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-55-06-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-55-06-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 55/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-55-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-55-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KA 23/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-ka-23-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-ka-23-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 RJ 517/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-rj-517-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-rj-517-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3433/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3433-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3433-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => dfce9d1a6404eba12f3de26efbbfab34 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5624b345b2a54bb4c98eff25b6b30cfc:0.67928900 1756894783 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.