| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 1 R 544/13 | 23.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 121/18 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AL 29/17 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 29/19 | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 14 AS 1089/20 ER | 08.09.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 862/20 B ER | 08.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 4322/16 | 29.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 2055/18 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 1/21 R | 18.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 2548/19 | 28.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 383/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 2318/19 | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 337/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 304/20 | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 336/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 BA237/19 | 10.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 2081/16 | 15.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 SO 133/18 ER | 15.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 43/18 B ER | 10.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 1103/17 | 05.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 15/19 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 133/16 | 16.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 86/18 | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 156 AS 17196/13 | 06.08.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2354/15 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 112/20 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1339/16 | 29.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 74/18 | 30.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 104/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1339/16 | 29.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 74/18 | 30.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 104/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 159/15 | 23.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 55/18 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 93/20 B | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 69 R 1434/18 WA | 27.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 738/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 7/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 39 AS 16448/16 | 26.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 835/18 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 159/19 B | 14.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 41/17 | 19.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 9/18 | 25.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 R 1524/16 | 13.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 305/18 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 37 R 1226/16 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 293/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 351/19 | 25.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 331/19 | 25.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 SO 170/20 | 16.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 237/20 | 28.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 85/20 B | 10.12.2020 | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 AY 33/19 | 26.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 32/20 | 11.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 18. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 314 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 314 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 314 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 121/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-121-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-121-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-29-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-29-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 862/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-862-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-862-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2055/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2055-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2055-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 2548/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-2548-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-2548-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 2318/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-2318-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-2318-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 304/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-304-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-304-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 BA237/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ba237-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ba237-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 2081/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-2081-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-2081-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 SO 133/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-so-133-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-so-133-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 1103/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-1103-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-1103-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 86/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-86-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-86-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2354/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2354-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2354-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 74/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-74-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-74-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 74/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-74-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-74-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 55/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-55-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-55-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 738/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-738-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-738-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 835/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-835-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-835-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 9/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-9-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-9-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 305/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-305-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-305-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 R 1226/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-r-1226-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-r-1226-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 351/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-351-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-351-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 331/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-331-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-331-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 170/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-170-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-170-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AY 33/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-ay-33-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-ay-33-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 121/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-121-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-121-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b0cca4c340e34cb34bc0254d543a2d6e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5e5b26795af842468014d105b4ece010:0.49435800 1751044197 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.