| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 546/04 | 09.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 3777/05 | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 AL 344/03 | 31.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 739/06 | 27.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 51/05 ER | 09.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 B 4/06 ER | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 3. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 26 (22,46) RA 128/04 | 22.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 3. Juli 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 6 KNK 34/04 | 25.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KNK 11/05 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 3. Juli 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 120/06 | 21.06.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 120/06 | 21.06.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 6 RJ 182/01 | 04.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 445/04 | 25.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 U 287/01 | 01.12.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 414/03 | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 23 U 917/02 | 27.08.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 372/04 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 47/06 B | 29.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 347/99 | 24.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 275/03 | 30.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 279/00 | 31.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 212/04 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 160/01 | 18.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 141/03 | 01.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 24/02 | 26.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 102/04 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 RJ 38/01 | 26.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 600/02 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 RJ 1386/02 A | 04.06.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 539/03 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 LW 22/05 | 01.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 37/05 | 12.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 KR 58/05 | 08.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 231/05 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 KR 280/03 | 13.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 170/04 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 325/03 | 12.10.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 83/05 | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 KR 303/03 | 20.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 72/05 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 KR 198/01 | 25.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 62/05 | 09.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 KR 814/02 | 23.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 4/05 | 25.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 156/05 | 17.08.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 111/05 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 AL 626/03 | 09.08.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 357/05 | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3146 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3777/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3777-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3777-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 739/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-739-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-739-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 51/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-51-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-51-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 (22,46) RA 128/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-2246-ra-128-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:35:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:35:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-2246-ra-128-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KNK 11/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-knk-11-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-knk-11-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 120/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-120-06-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-120-06-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 120/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-120-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-120-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 445/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-445-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:42:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:42:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-445-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 414/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-414-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-414-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 372/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-372-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:42:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:42:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-372-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 275/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-275-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-275-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 U 212/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-u-212-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-u-212-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 141/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-141-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-141-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 102/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-102-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-102-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 600/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-600-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-600-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 539/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-539-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-539-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 LW 37/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-lw-37-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-lw-37-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 231/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-231-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-231-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 170/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-170-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-170-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 83/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-83-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-83-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 72/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-72-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-72-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 62/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-62-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-62-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 4/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-4-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-4-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 111/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-111-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-111-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 357/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-357-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-357-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3777/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3777-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3777-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7adcc20862225e50c3ac567df2b8122d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8e7775c6323e83696bc7c66d55a9c515:0.46428400 1756567903 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.