| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 U 360/04 | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1451/06 | 29.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | 20.05.2005 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/05 R | 30.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 23.11.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/05 R | 30.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AL 23/04 | 02.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 (9) AL 151/04 | 06.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 56/05 R | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KA 620/00 | 17.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 4316/02 | 09.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 76/04 R | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 26 P 61/97 | 20.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 P 4/02 | 24.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 6/04 R | 26.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 RJ 1187/01 | 20.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3501/03 | 08.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/05 R | 23.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 31/01 KZA | 14.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 257/03 | 03.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 17/05 R | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 16 KR 71/00 | 16.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 224/01 | 01.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 9/05 R | 23.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 KR 2142/03 | 23.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3433/04 | 19.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 21/05 R | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 16 AS 350/05 ER | 22.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 233/05 AS-ER | 10.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 3 RA 390/04 | 22.04.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 B 32/05 RA | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 5 RA 2574/03 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 558/05 | 18.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 895/05 | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 KR 2069/04 | 26.04.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 551/05 NZB | 20.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 11 R 2468/05 ER | 17.11.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 967/05 ER | 09.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 3 RA 759/99 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 886/05 ER | 03.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 19 RJ 175/01 | 19.05.2003 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 581/03 | 24.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 4 KR 392/02 | 05.11.2003 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 195/04 | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 3546/01 | 30.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 AL 42/03-14 | 01.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 25 R 165/05 | 07.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 R 15/06 R | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 25 R 157/05 | 07.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 12/06 R | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 149/06 | 21.06.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 29. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 116/06 | 21.06.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 29. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 1 U 5035/02 | 10.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 461/04 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3149 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1451/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1451-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1451-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 14/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-14-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-14-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 56/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-56-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-56-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 76/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-76-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:20:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:20:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-76-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 6/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-6-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-6-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83512 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 17/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-17-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-17-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 9/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-9-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-9-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 21/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-21-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-21-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 233/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-233-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-233-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 32/05 RA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-32-05-ra [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-32-05-ra/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 558/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-558-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-558-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 895/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-895-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-895-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 551/05 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-551-05-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-551-05-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 967/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-967-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-967-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 886/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-886-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-886-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 581/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-581-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-581-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 195/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-195-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-195-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 3546/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-3546-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-3546-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 165/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-165-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-165-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 157/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-157-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-157-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 149/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-149-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-149-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 116/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-116-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-116-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 U 461/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-u-461-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:41:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:41:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-u-461-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1451/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1451-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1451-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7cf8a4c48c13f49c8be8aa3776d10e3f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:33547ccdfcd985151de6879698ea96bc:0.46835100 1756543677 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.