| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 11 R 308/16 | 09.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 18. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 15 AL 569/18 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 18. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 32 AS 3077/16 | 05.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 18. Januar 2021 | ||
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 3/19 EK AL | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2021 | |||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 18 KR 51/05 | 20.10.2008 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 37/16 ZVW | 15.12.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| S 62 AL 519/15 geführten Klageverfahrens eine En | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 276/19 EK AL | 06.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 2/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 684/14 | 11.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 109/18 | 04.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 338/18 | 26.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 34/20 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 207/20 ER | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 394/20 B ER | 08.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 1042/12 | 13.01.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 5104/16 | 12.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 17/18 R | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 2650/15 | 07.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 674/17 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 15 R 222/18 | 16.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 R 947/20 B | 29.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 SO 170/20 | 16.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 237/20 | 28.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 85/20 B | 10.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 120/14 | 22.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 735/15 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 BA 63/19 | 31.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 15. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 SO 50/18 | 15.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 148/19 B | 21.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 SO 50/18 | 15.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 148/19 B | 21.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 446/18 | 25.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 88/19 | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1320/15 | 14.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 83/18 | 22.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 219/20 ER | 02.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 409/20 B ER | 22.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 169 KR 1043/17 | 06.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 252/19 | 04.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 269/16 | 24.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 72/17 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 57 AL 2800/14 | 16.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 44/17 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AL 133/15 | 11.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 151/18 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 7285/20 ER | 04.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1531/20 B ER | 08.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 315 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 315 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 315 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 308/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-308-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-308-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 569/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-569-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-569-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 3077/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-3077-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-3077-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 3/19 EK AL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-3-19-ek-al [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-3-19-ek-al/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130198 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 37/16 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-37-16-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-37-16-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 276/19 EK AL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-276-19-ek-al [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-276-19-ek-al/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 109/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-109-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-109-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 34/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-34-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-34-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 394/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-394-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-394-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 17/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-17-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-17-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 674/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-674-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-674-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 R 947/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-r-947-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-r-947-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 237/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-237-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-237-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 120/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-120-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-120-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 BA 63/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ba-63-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ba-63-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 148/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-148-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-148-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 148/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-148-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-148-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 88/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-88-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-88-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 83/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-83-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-83-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 409/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-409-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-409-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 252/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-252-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-252-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 72/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-72-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-72-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 44/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-44-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-44-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 151/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-151-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-151-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1531/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1531-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1531-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 308/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-308-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-308-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 06fa0c980fbee41b34ab4d4a98ab5739 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fb9d45f3de5278803a02cdea62c3ef4c:0.61824600 1751071719 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.