| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AS 7121/05 | 30.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 B 238/06 AS PKH | 12.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 92 AS 11438/05 ER | 09.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 B 142/06 AS ER | 24.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 11830/05 ER | 14.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 B 251/06 AS ER | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 2 SO 106/06 ER | 15.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 45/06 SO ER | 30.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AS 396/05 ER | 26.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 2/06 AS ER | 11.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AS 886/05 ER | 24.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 188/06 AS ER | 31.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 21 AS 41/05 PKH | 20.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 B 1008/05 AS PKH | 24.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 4604/05 | 21.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 B 1047/05 AS PKH | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 152/03 | 15.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 43/05 | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 RJ 45/03 | 05.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 144/05 | 14.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 9 RJ 258/01 | 30.06.2003 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 771/05 WA | 30.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 KR 614/00 | 27.08.2002 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 959/02 | 19.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 11 RA 1460/03 | 02.03.2004 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 RA 383/04 | 30.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 7 RA 939/00 | 23.09.2002 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 RA 1031/02 | 30.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 5 RJ 1609/03 | 21.07.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 654/05 | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 10/06 ER | 02.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 28. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 272/04 | 20.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 28. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 241/04 | 29.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 28. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 49/06 ER | 30.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 16/06 | 29.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 AS 371/05 | 09.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 27. Juni 2006 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 5310/04 PKH-A | 29.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 920/05 | 14.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3997/05 | 29.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 R 294/06 AK-A | 08.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1933/06 AK-B | 23.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 AS 1633/06 ER-B | 22.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 1810/06 ER-B | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3151 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 B 238/06 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-b-238-06-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-b-238-06-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 B 142/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-b-142-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-b-142-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 B 251/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-b-251-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-b-251-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 45/06 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-45-06-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-45-06-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 2/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-2-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-2-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 188/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-188-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-188-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 B 1008/05 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-b-1008-05-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-b-1008-05-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 B 1047/05 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-b-1047-05-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-b-1047-05-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 43/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-43-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-43-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 144/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-144-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-144-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 771/05 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-771-05-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-771-05-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 959/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-959-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-959-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 383/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-383-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-383-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 1031/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-1031-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-1031-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 654/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-654-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-654-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 10/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-10-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-10-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 272/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-272-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-272-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 241/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-241-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-241-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 49/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-49-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-49-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 16/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-16-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-16-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 371/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-371-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-371-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 5310/04 PKH-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-5310-04-pkh-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-5310-04-pkh-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3997/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3997-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3997-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1933/06 AK-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1933-06-ak-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1933-06-ak-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1810/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1810-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1810-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 B 238/06 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-b-238-06-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:07:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:07:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-b-238-06-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2770cc7c051484b672910064b023852f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3e7b9770d2ade464a0ae3f7ef403ac00:0.35196600 1756526346 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.