| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1461/05 PKH-A | 02.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 678/06 A | 20.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 397/06 A | 30.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 AL 1535/02 | 21.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 173/05 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 U 4446/02 | 02.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 151/05 | 26.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 318/01 | 17.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 15/05 | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 RJ 97/02 | 19.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RJ 57/04 | 23.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 12 RA 104/01 | 23.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RA 38/04 | 09.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 55 AS 1397/05 ER | 15.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 401/05 ER AS | 06.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 P 47/05 | 29.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 P 3/05 | 31.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 50 AS 472/05 ER | 09.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 26. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 55 AS 1397/05 ER | 15.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 401/05 ER AS | 06.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 13 AS 178/05 ER | 19.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 389/05 AS ER | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 839/05 ER | 14.06.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 B 325/05 R ER | 26.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 3 RA 377/99 ER.E | 18.01.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 B 38/00 KR | 04.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 7 VR 4/97 Al | 24.03.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 B 120/97 AL-ER | 29.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 4556/01 | 27.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 284/04 | 19.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 RJ 01957/00 | 12.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 120/02 | 28.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 AL 1764/02 | 18.09.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 255/03 | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 2/05 R | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 AL 103/01 | 12.06.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 274/03 | 15.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 5/05 R | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 17 KR 18/01 | 18.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 15/02 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 21/05 B | 13.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 45 U 245/03 | 30.11.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/05 R | 07.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 440/01 | 11.11.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 1/05 R | 26.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AL 2075/03 | 27.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 226/04 NZB | 05.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 8 U 219/02 | 16.09.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 B 162/02 U-PKH | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3152 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1461/05 PKH-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1461-05-pkh-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1461-05-pkh-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 678/06 A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-678-06-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-678-06-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 397/06 A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-397-06-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-397-06-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 173/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-173-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-173-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 151/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-151-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-151-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 15/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-15-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-15-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 57/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-57-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-57-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RA 38/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ra-38-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ra-38-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 401/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-401-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-401-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 3/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-3-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-3-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 50 AS 472/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-50-as-472-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-50-as-472-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 55 AS 1397/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-55-as-1397-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-55-as-1397-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 389/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-389-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:22:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:22:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-389-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 325/05 R ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-325-05-r-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:22:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:22:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-325-05-r-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 38/00 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-38-00-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:30:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:30:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-38-00-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 B 120/97 AL-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-b-120-97-al-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:30:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:30:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-b-120-97-al-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 284/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-284-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-284-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 120/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-120-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-120-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 2/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-2-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-2-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11a AL 5/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11a-al-5-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11a-al-5-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 21/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-21-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-21-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83485 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 1/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-1-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-1-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 226/04 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-226-04-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-226-04-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 162/02 U-PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-162-02-u-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-162-02-u-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1461/05 PKH-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1461-05-pkh-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:48:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:48:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1461-05-pkh-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5fc05573f2af76e7f51dfdf5bbb54f5d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0276a2c47e85c31ddaf835ea791fccb7:0.43363700 1756514079 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.