| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 2296/03 | 11.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 784/06 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 V 3284/01 | 09.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 V 761/06 | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 U 3916/04 | 16.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 U 755/06 | 22.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 KR 1163/04 | 05.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 658/06 | 09.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 646/06 W-A | 14.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 5 KR 1103/05 | 18.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 604/06 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 93/03 | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 578/06 | 08.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 561/06 PKH-A | 15.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 R 3647/03 | 03.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 558/06 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 R 3810/05 | 24.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 546/06 | 09.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 RA 2380/01 | 13.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 510/04 | 30.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 U 2210/00 | 18.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 474/03 | 04.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 AL 2731/04 | 18.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AL 470/06 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 AL 8321/04 | 29.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 432/06 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 KR 05748/01 | 14.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 422/03 | 23.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 AL 3726/04 | 14.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AL 413/05 | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 AS 541/05 | 15.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 376/06 | 16.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 457/03 | 09.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 335/04 | 31.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 11 R 2648/03 | 22.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 277/06 | 15.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 U 665/04 | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 196/06 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 RA 03673/99 | 26.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 194/03 | 18.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 138/05 ER | 19.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 B 350/05 ER KA | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 07.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 175/02 ER | 01.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 9016/05 ER | 09.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 B 1351/05 AS ER | 26.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 9350/05 ER | 27.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 B 1307/05 AS ER | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 21. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3158 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3158 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3158 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 784/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-784-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-784-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 761/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-761-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-761-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 755/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-755-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-755-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 658/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-658-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-658-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 646/06 W-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-646-06-w-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-646-06-w-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 604/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-604-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-604-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 578/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-578-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-578-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 561/06 PKH-A [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-561-06-pkh-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-561-06-pkh-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 558/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-558-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-558-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 546/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-546-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-546-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 510/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-510-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-510-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 474/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-474-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-474-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 470/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-470-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-470-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 432/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-432-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-432-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 422/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-422-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-422-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 413/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-413-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-413-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 376/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-376-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-376-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 335/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-335-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-335-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 277/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-277-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-277-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 196/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-196-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-196-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 194/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-194-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:44:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:44:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-194-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 350/05 ER KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-350-05-er-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:48:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:48:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-350-05-er-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 175/02 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-175-02-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-175-02-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 AS 9016/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-as-9016-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-as-9016-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 94 AS 9350/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-94-as-9350-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-94-as-9350-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 784/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-784-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:45:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:45:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-784-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c4a2c5c5b3334e73dd8efe17daa9a51d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1365036dd0bc513e3d3fb8400ba7f9bd:0.71793600 1756496314 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.