| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 76/05 | 21.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 76/05 | 21.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 28 AS 146/06 ER | 21.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 99/05 ER | 16.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 LW 45/04 ER | 15.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 LW 45/04 ER | 15.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 RJ 611/04 | 02.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 11 ER 39/06 SO | 07.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 50/06 SO | 19.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 3 ER 36/06 AS | 17.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 47/06 AS | 26.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 ER 29/06 AS | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 46/06 AS | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 4 ER 44/06 AS | 24.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 41/06 AS | 04.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 13 ER 8/06 AY Ko | 01.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 37/06 AY | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 11 ER 205/05 KR Sp | 29.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 ER 99/05 KR | 25.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 11 ER 204/05 Kr Sp | 29.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 ER 98/05 KR | 25.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 13 ER 140/05 AS | 19.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 ER 79/05 AS | 12.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 SO 433/06 ER | 01.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 62/06 SO ER | 23.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 311/05 ER | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 B 28/06 KR ER | 24.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AS 7703/05 ER | 12.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 B 1312/05 AS ER | 27.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AY 327/05 ER | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 4/06 AY ER | 02.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 20 SO 114/05 ER | 04.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 B 1083/05 SO ER | 01.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 10950/05 ER | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 1394/05 AS ER | 27.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 63 AS 6505/05 ER | 16.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 1274/05 AS ER | 15.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 93 AS 8743/05 ER | 05.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 1354/05 AS ER | 13.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 RA 4931/04 ER | 26.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 B 461/05 R ER | 28.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 106/05 ER | 06.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 B 1035/05 KA ER | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3159 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3159 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3159 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 78950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 76/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-76-05-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-76-05-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 76/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-76-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-76-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 AS 146/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-as-146-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-as-146-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 99/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-99-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-99-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 LW 45/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-lw-45-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-lw-45-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 LW 45/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-lw-45-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-lw-45-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 RJ 611/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-rj-611-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-rj-611-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 50/06 SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-50-06-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-50-06-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 47/06 AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-47-06-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-47-06-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 46/06 AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-46-06-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-46-06-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 41/06 AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-41-06-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-41-06-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 37/06 AY [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-37-06-ay [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-37-06-ay/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 ER 99/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-er-99-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-er-99-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 ER 98/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-er-98-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-er-98-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135343 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 ER 79/05 AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-er-79-05-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-er-79-05-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 62/06 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-62-06-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-62-06-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 B 28/06 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-b-28-06-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-b-28-06-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 1312/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-1312-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-1312-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 4/06 AY ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-4-06-ay-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-4-06-ay-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 B 1083/05 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-b-1083-05-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-b-1083-05-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 1394/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-1394-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-1394-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 1274/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-1274-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-1274-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 1354/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-1354-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-1354-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 461/05 R ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-461-05-r-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-461-05-r-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 1035/05 KA ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-1035-05-ka-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-1035-05-ka-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 76/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-76-05-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:28:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:28:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-76-05-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a0269580588127b11fecfb5667c8771e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bf8631fd18f9bee5e6a12dd99250a591:0.58663600 1756496315 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.