| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 84 AL 1210/19 | 13.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 4/20 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 4518/15 | 15.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 20/20 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 18 AL 145/15 | 09.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 169/18 | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 84 AL 2632/14 | 05.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 99/19 | 07.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 184/20 ER | 25.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 119/20 B ER | 14.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 2328/14 | 01.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 5/18 | 08.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 1986/15 | 24.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 13/18 | 09.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 78/18 | 09.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 54/19 | 14.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1010/11 | 15.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 30/17 | 23.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 2232/16 | 23.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 54/18 | 07.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 12 KR 233/14 | 13.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 122/18 WA | 02.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 BA 160/20 ER | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 65/20 B ER | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 1683/18 | 28.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 4356/18 | 17.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 8/19 R | 11.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 28 SO 587/14 | 21.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 85/18 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 1853/15 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 66/19 | 01.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 97/16 | 14.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 39/18 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 56/16 | 12.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 22/18 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 104/16 | 13.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 3/18 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 48 R 556/13 (SG Lübeck) | 18.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 142/16 | 03.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 6 KR 576/20 ER | 09.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 14. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1062/11 | 05.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 KR 112/14 | 06.06.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 32/16 B | 18.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KN 108/15 KR | 04.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 395/16 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 43/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 116/15 | 14.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 169/17 | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 R 467/18 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 11 R 323/19 NZB | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 AY 33/19 | 26.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 32/20 | 11.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 316 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 316 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 316 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 20/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-20-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-20-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 169/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-169-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-169-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 99/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-99-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-99-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 119/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-119-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-119-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-5-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-5-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 54/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-54-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-54-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 30/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-30-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-30-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 54/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-54-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-54-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 122/18 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-122-18-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-122-18-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 65/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-65-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-65-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 8/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-8-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-8-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 85/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-85-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:07:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:07:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-85-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 66/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-66-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-66-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 39/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-39-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-39-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 3/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-3-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-3-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 142/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-142-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-142-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 576/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-576-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-576-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 112/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-112-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-112-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 395/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-395-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-395-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 116/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-116-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-116-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 R 467/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-r-467-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-r-467-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 32/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-32-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-32-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:27:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:27:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => eef87881e8a58e1ef5ca22b8aec2364a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:340e249fdf283063c111a86513cfc7c0:0.51450200 1751072117 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.