| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 RJ 692/99 | 16.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 6 RJ 89/04 | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 13. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 77/06 ER AS | 01.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 394/06 ER | 29.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 13. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 17 KR 85/04 | 11.03.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 48/05 | 10.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 2 KR 101/02 | 13.08.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 143/04 | 26.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 46 (15) RJ 276/01 | 29.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 13. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 AS 76/05 ER | 13.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 13. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 U 72/01 | 07.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 34/05 | 21.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 507/01 | 02.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 70/04 | 21.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 8 U 159/05 | 26.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 238/05 | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 5 AL 413/04 | 29.08.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 137/05 | 05.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 768/06 ER | 20.05.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 283/06 ER | 07.06.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 205/02 | 21.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 329/04 | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 24 U 200/03 | 10.03.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 167/05 | 27.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 R 4317/01 | 13.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 811/05 | 13.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 R 717/04 | 09.08.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 742/05 | 14.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 8 RJ 1478/03 | 21.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 660/04 | 11.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 P 113/03 | 22.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 P 73/04 | 12.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 1406/04 | 29.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 250/05 | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 KR 775/03 | 20.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 74/04 | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 32 KA 5037/01 | 29.08.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 KA 5003/04 | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 EG 102/02 | 09.08.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 98/04 | 06.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 1 AS 111/05 | 17.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 91/05 | 21.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 50 AS 193/05 | 12.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 76/05 | 21.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 144/03 | 16.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 526/04 | 24.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juni 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AS 394/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-as-394-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-as-394-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 48/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-48-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-48-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 143/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-143-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-143-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 (15) RJ 276/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-15-rj-276-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:35:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:35:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-15-rj-276-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 76/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-76-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:19:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:19:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-76-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 34/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-34-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-34-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 70/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-70-04-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-70-04-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 238/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-238-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-238-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 137/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-137-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-137-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 768/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-768-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-768-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 283/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-283-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-283-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 329/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-329-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-329-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 167/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-167-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-167-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 811/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-811-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-811-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 742/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-742-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-742-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 660/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-660-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-660-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 P 73/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-p-73-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-p-73-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 250/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-250-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-250-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 74/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-74-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-74-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 5003/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-5003-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-5003-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 98/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-98-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-98-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 91/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-91-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-91-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 76/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-76-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-76-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 526/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-526-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:40:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:40:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-526-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5f55c88c829f0497a96bf1605ff5ad6a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0ec2abae726770610a67335f6385b119:0.47127900 1756480104 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.