| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 8 RA 164/99 | 16.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 RA 23/02 | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 15/05 R | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 AL 197/03 | 24.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 89/04 | 07.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 44/05 R | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Juni 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 802/06 ER | 29.05.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 2. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 U 95/03 | 11.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 147/04 | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 2. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 AS 2353/05 | 03.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 1. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 AL 3328/05 | 23.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 1. Juni 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 25/05 | 09.01.2006 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 B 16/06 SO | 03.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AS 626/05 ER | 20.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 B 21/06 AS ER | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 676/02 | 27.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 166/03 | 22.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 203/05 KR | 24.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 63/06 KR ER | 07.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 11612/05 ER | 05.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 B 42/06 AS ER | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 85/04 | 28.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 B 1099/05 U | 24.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 5 RA 99/01 | 09.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 RA 156/04 | 08.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Juni 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 816/04 | 22.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 48/05 | 22.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1505/02 | 25.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 SO 1225/05 | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 KR 476/05 | 09.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 28/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 KR 445/05 | 11.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3780/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 SO 2047/05 | 15.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 KR 2884/05 | 27.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 15 KR 232/04 | 27.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 389/05 | 10.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 SO 70/05 ER | 20.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 B 585/05 SO ER | 04.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 13 AS 149/06 ER | 27.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 236/06 AS ER | 10.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 AS 9/06 ER | 23.01.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 233/06 AS ER | 11.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 AS 93/06 ER | 03.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 208/06 AS ER | 10.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3166 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3166 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3166 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 44/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-44-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-44-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 802/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-802-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-802-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 95/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-95-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-95-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 2353/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-2353-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-2353-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AL 3328/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-al-3328-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-al-3328-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 16/06 SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-16-06-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:13:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:13:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-16-06-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 21/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-21-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-21-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 166/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-166-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-166-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 63/06 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-63-06-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-63-06-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 B 42/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-b-42-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-b-42-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 1099/05 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-1099-05-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-1099-05-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 RA 156/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ra-156-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ra-156-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 48/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-48-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-48-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 1505/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-1505-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-1505-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 1225/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-1225-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-1225-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 476/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-476-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-476-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 445/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-445-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-445-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 2047/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-2047-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-2047-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 2884/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-2884-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-2884-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 389/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-389-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:39:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:39:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-389-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 114000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 B 585/05 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-b-585-05-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:39:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:39:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-b-585-05-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 236/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-236-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:39:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:39:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-236-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 233/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-233-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:39:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:39:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-233-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 208/06 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-208-06-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:39:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:39:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-208-06-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c299af4b79355cd94d4bc89ae63f335c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1ac37948b1b594ed14fa51ff9cb6f73b:0.99102400 1756475502 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.