| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 642/17 | 13.06.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 349/18 | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 R 4795/16 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 1487/18 | 21.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 27/18 R | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 4999/16 | 23.07.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 19/18 R | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 28 R 345/15 | 05.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 R 621/16 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 6/19 R | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 1963/16 | 19.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 828/17 | 19.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 4/19 R | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 R 537/16 | 05.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 158/17 | 30.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/19 R | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 4 R 361/14 | 27.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 696/16 | 24.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 1/19 R | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 1670/17 | 19.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1764/18 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 22/20 R | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 33 AL 245/14 | 21.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 7/16 | 14.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 28/19 R | 14.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 48 R 173/12 | 20.10.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 175/16 | 13.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 9/19 R | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 313/12 | 28.04.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 195/15 | 08.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 4/18 R | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 AS 519/17 | 02.01.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 AS 177/18 | 09.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 4/20 R | 19.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 12 R 119/16 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 159/19 | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 13. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 1076/15 | 19.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2789/17 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 1843/16 | 19.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3935/18 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2021 | |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 445/20 | 09.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2021 | |||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 590/20 | 15.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2021 | |||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 998/19 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2021 | |||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 49 SF 285/19 E | 11.05.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 531/20 B | 28.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 4 AS 205/17 | 29.01.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 94/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 82/20 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 763/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 13. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 KG 1/20 | 20.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 13. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 13 KR 70/17 ER | 27.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 13. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 37/19 | 25.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 8/20 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1062/11 | 05.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 KR 112/14 | 06.06.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 349/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-349-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-349-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 27/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-27-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-27-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 19/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-19-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-19-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 4/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-4-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-4-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 22/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-22-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-22-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 28/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-28-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-28-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 9/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-9-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-9-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 159/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-159-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-159-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 2789/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-2789-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-2789-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 3935/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-3935-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-3935-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 445/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-445-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-445-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 590/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-590-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-590-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 998/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-998-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-998-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 531/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-531-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-531-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 94/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-94-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-94-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 763/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-763-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-763-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KG 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kg-1-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kg-1-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 70/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-70-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-70-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 8/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-8-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-8-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1062/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1062-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:52:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:52:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1062-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 349/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-349-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-349-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 93342a2a43472dde35c717f5fa5ab3dd [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2f050f1fb5445850d3ef757ab8a139db:0.68510300 1751100580 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.