| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 AS 1472/05 ER | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 391/05 ER AS | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 22. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2371/00 | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2801/01 | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1/02 | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 166/05 ER | 19.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 66/05 ER | 01.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 2/06 ER | 09.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 188/05 ER | 12.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 22. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 P 16/02 | 10.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 P 4/04 | 01.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 64 AL 1821/01 | 01.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 64/04 | 07.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 AY 3/06 ER | 07.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 19. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 11.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9a/9 V 8/03 R | 24.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | 03.07.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a/7 AL 48/04 R | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 23.12.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 211/03 | 19.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 8/05 R | 15.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 05.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 22/05 R | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | 02.04.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 01.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 2/05 R | 21.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 58 AS 536/06 ER | 05.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 158/06 ER AS | 10.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 18. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 AS 13/06 ER | 14.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AY 37/05 ER | 17.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 18. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 28 KR 137/06 ER | 31.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 18. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 733/98 W01 | 08.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 69/02 | 28.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 57 AL 1720/03 | 26.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 45/04 | 07.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 4956/03 | 04.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 21/05 | 05.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 52 AL 499/03 | 10.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 1/04 | 07.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 AS 61/06 ER | 17.05.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Mai 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 391/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-391-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-391-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 2371/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-2371-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-2371-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 2801/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-2801-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-2801-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 1/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-1-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-1-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 166/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-166-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-166-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 66/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-66-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-66-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 2/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-2-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-2-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 188/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-188-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-188-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 4/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-4-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-4-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 64/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-64-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-64-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AY 3/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ay-3-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ay-3-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9a/9 V 8/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9a-9-v-8-03-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9a-9-v-8-03-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a/7 AL 48/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-7-al-48-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-7-al-48-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 8/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-8-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-8-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7a AL 22/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7a-al-22-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7a-al-22-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 2/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-2-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-2-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 158/06 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-158-06-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-158-06-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 13/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-13-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-13-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AY 37/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-ay-37-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-ay-37-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 137/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-137-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-137-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 69/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-69-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-69-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 45/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-45-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-45-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 21/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-21-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-21-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 1/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-1-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:05:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:05:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-1-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 61/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-61-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-61-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 391/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-391-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:50:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:50:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-391-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e7d940b0fc6103be2127738c7d6dcb0a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:47442308fb110ffcad4adbc21c9f3992:0.48791700 1756445757 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.