| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 AS 92/06 ER | 26.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AS 626/06 ER-B | 27.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 U 700/02 | 16.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 585/04 | 23.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 SO 8009/05 ER | 10.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 509/06 ER-B | 07.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 AS 3418/05 ER | 15.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AS 403/06 ER | 26.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 AS 3867/06 ER | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AS 369/06 ER-B | 20.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 AL 682/05 | 09.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 353/06 NZB | 07.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 AS 3889/05 ER | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 108/06 ER-B | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 SO 1743/05 PKH-A | 21.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 96/06 PKH-B | 06.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 AS 770/06 ER | 20.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 160/06 ER AS | 02.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 15. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 119/03 | 15.11.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 16/05 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 23/06 ER | 06.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 78/05 | 14.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 KG 11/05 | 17.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 67/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 74/05 | 15.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 7 RA 320/03 | 26.01.2006 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 R 112/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Lübeck | 15. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 425/05 | 02.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 12. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 AS 494/05 | 10.04.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 12. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 9 AS 396/05 ER | 15.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 11. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 1 U 5013/00 | 27.02.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 253/04 | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 492/01 | 30.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 167/04 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 41 U 445/99 | 20.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 62/05 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5061/03 | 26.10.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 22/05 | 29.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 3 RJ 1167/98 | 11.12.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 128/04 | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 EG 318/02 | 25.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 41/05 | 30.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 945/04 | 23.08.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 372/05 | 31.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Mai 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 626/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-626-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-626-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 585/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-585-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-585-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 509/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-509-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-509-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 403/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-403-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-403-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 369/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-369-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-369-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 353/06 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-353-06-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-353-06-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 108/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-108-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-108-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 96/06 PKH-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-96-06-pkh-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-96-06-pkh-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 160/06 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-160-06-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-160-06-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 16/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-16-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-16-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 23/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-23-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-23-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 78/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-78-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-78-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KG 11/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kg-11-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kg-11-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 74/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-74-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-74-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 RA 320/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ra-320-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ra-320-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 425/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-425-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-425-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 494/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-494-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-494-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 396/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-396-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-396-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 253/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-253-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-253-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 167/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-167-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-167-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 62/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-62-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-62-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 22/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-22-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-22-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 128/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-128-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-128-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 41/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-41-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-41-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 372/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-372-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-372-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 626/06 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-626-06-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-626-06-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 857153cd2bd20b355e6d720bf130037e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8912dd1bd5f197fb7b48a2d33cf28fd2:0.84268200 1756421987 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.