| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 AL 2237/04 | 25.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 5206/04 | 19.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 AL 496/05 | 18.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 171/05 AL-PKH | 04.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 KR 351/05 ER | 04.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 143/05 KR-ER | 10.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 AL 987/01 | 17.07.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 AL 212/03 | 10.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 AS 418/05 | 21.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 4. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 8 U 289/03 | 09.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 167/05 | 09.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 31 AL 674/05 | 11.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 142/05 AL-ER | 19.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 440/03 | 12.01.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 1304/04 | 06.04.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 1272/04 | 06.04.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 RJ 952/03 | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 RJ 1086/03 | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 69/02 | 06.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 394/03 | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 AL 501/00 | 14.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 24/05 | 16.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 67/02 | 27.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 407/02 | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AS 268/05 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 43/06 ER | 23.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 102/03 | 12.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 19/05 | 24.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 9/05 R | 02.02.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 25.02.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/04 R | 16.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 14.07.2005 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 30/05 R | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 4 KR 554/04 | 08.11.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 34/04 R | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 102/03 | 12.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 19/05 | 24.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 9/05 R | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Mai 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 43 AS 317/05 ER | 14.11.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 122/05 ER | 28.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 594/98 A | 22.06.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 69/01 | 28.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 2 AL 477/02 | 10.11.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 15/05 | 31.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 8 KR 499/02 | 21.09.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 160/04 | 22.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. April 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 5206/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-5206-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-5206-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 171/05 AL-PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-171-05-al-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-171-05-al-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 143/05 KR-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-143-05-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-143-05-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AL 212/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-al-212-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-al-212-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 418/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-418-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-418-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 167/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-167-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-167-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 142/05 AL-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-142-05-al-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-142-05-al-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 440/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-440-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-440-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 1304/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-1304-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-1304-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 1272/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-1272-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-1272-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 RJ 952/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-rj-952-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-rj-952-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 RJ 1086/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-rj-1086-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-rj-1086-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 394/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-394-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:37:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:37:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-394-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 24/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-24-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:36:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:36:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-24-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 407/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-407-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:36:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:36:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-407-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 43/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-43-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:35:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:35:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-43-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 19/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-19-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:11:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:11:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-19-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:19:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:19:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 30/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-30-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-30-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 34/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-34-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-34-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 9/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-9-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-9-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 122/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-122-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:13:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:13:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-122-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 69/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-69-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:10:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:10:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-69-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 15/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-15-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-15-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 160/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-160-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-160-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 5206/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-5206-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-5206-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 21e0acc355745d905662db0bc4f0643d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:450e913687d7cce4c23bfbd45eabca3d:0.27868100 1756402919 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.