| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 314/12 | 28.04.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 171/15 B | 24.08.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 12. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 R 1524/16 | 13.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 12. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 SO 1826/16 | 06.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3813/16 ER-B | 23.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 AS 2252/20 ER | 21.10.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 902/20 B ER | 04.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 20 AS 68/15 | 14.06.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 696/18 | 15.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 1 AL 391/14 | 04.05.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 150/15 | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 28 AL 388/18 | 19.02.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 42/19 | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 29 SF 3344/17 E | 05.02.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 285/19 B | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 2374/17 | 04.02.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 384/19 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 2122/15 | 20.11.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 205/18 | 20.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 138/20 | 04.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 35/15 und S 12 KA 39/15 | 04.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1401/15 | 28.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 795/18 | 08.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 8 AS 1957/19 | 25.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 993/20 B | 02.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 35 AS 120/14 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1601/20 NZB | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 1624/19 | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 692/20 B | 22.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 KN 116/09 u. S 40 R 2848/10 | 19.10.2011 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 KN 36/15 | 01.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 49 KR 1074/17 | 20.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 R 628/20 B | 03.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 2374/19 | 14.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 30 AS 4219/20 ER | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 3361/19 | 29.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 29 AS 700/19 | 04.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 11. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AS 3691/17 | 14.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 659/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AS 2931/18 | 14.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 660/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 2702/17 | 13.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 718/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 314/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-314-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-314-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 R 1524/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-r-1524-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-r-1524-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 79212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3813/16 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3813-16-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 20:16:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 19:16:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3813-16-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 902/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-902-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-902-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 696/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-696-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-696-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 150/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-150-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-150-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 42/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-42-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-42-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 285/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-285-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-285-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 384/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-384-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-384-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 205/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-205-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-205-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 138/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-138-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-138-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 35/15 und S 12 KA 39/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-35-15-und-s-12-ka-39-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-35-15-und-s-12-ka-39-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 795/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-795-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-795-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 993/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-993-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-993-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1601/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1601-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1601-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 692/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-692-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-692-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 KN 36/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-kn-36-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-kn-36-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 R 628/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-r-628-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-r-628-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 2374/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-2374-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-2374-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AS 4219/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-as-4219-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-as-4219-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 3361/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-3361-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-3361-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 700/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-700-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-700-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 3691/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-3691-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-3691-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 2931/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-2931-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-2931-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 2702/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-2702-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-2702-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 314/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-314-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-314-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 05070d8594c7f5247569125d190fc030 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:355abb36d6f688563ec72c3c456c2009:0.84167600 1751100880 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.