| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 123/04 | 19.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 18. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 11 AL 636/04 | 28.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 AL 197/05 | 03.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 AL 1856/02 ER-B | 14.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2459/02 ER-B | 22.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 524/05 ER | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 231/05 ER AS | 09.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AL 2598/03 | 03.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 22/04 | 27.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 13 VJ 1/99 | 09.09.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 VJ 4/03 | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 7 KN 290/98 U | 28.02.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KN 62/03 U | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RA 1610/02 | 31.03.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 172/03 | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 4/04 R | 29.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. April 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 50 AS 928/05 ER | 18.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 346/05 ER AS | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 61 AS 881/05 ER | 17.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 251/05 ER AS | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 50 AS 340/05 ER | 29.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 196/05 ER AS | 26.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 AS 532/05 ER AS | 17.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 167/05 ER AS | 19.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 AS 632/05 ER | 07.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 201/05 ER AS | 25.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 38 AL 593/99 | 24.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 AL 65/04 | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 AS 454/05 ER | 30.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 139/05 ER AS | 08.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 18 J 348/93 | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 6 RJ 21/99 | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 92/03 | 06.09.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 131/04 | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 13 KR 1046/02 | 26.11.2002 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 132/03 | 06.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 82/05 | 21.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 14. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 253/02 | 11.02.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 14. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 254/01 | 26.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 RI 106/01 Mz | 10.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 RI 38/04 | 31.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 ER 76/05 KR | 07.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 ER 57/05 KR | 25.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 14. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 SF 101/01 K | 28.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 14. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 108/03 | 10.11.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 14. April 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 123/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-123-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-123-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AL 197/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-al-197-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-al-197-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2459/02 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2459-02-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2459-02-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 231/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-231-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-231-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 22/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-22-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-22-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VJ 4/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vj-4-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vj-4-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KN 62/03 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kn-62-03-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kn-62-03-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 172/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-172-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-172-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 346/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-346-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-346-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 251/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-251-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:48:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:48:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-251-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 196/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-196-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:46:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:46:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-196-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 167/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-167-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:46:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:46:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-167-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 201/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-201-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:46:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:46:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-201-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 65/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-65-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:44:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:44:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-65-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 139/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-139-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-139-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 21/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-21-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-21-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 131/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-131-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-131-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 132/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-132-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-132-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 82/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-82-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-82-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 253/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-253-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-253-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KA 254/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ka-254-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ka-254-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RI 38/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ri-38-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ri-38-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 ER 57/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-er-57-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-er-57-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SF 101/01 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sf-101-01-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sf-101-01-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 108/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-108-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-108-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 123/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-123-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-123-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a44b6e6183bc2070f7a47e136eaad292 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b9c60c6ca142a2e4cea4ead8b6d766f7:0.75910300 1756344504 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.