| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 2 AL 382/01 | 07.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 38/03 | 27.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 8 KA 570/04 Mz | 30.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KA 33/05 | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 14 RH 165/05 SB | 16.12.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 B 41/06 RH | 01.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 392/03 | 24.06.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 128/05 | 23.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 509/03 | 14.04.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 228/05 ER | 23.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7/15 V 1676/98 | 10.11.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 V 6/04 | 09.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 LW 2534/03 ER | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5/16 LW 5/04 ER | 21.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 RA 146/00 | 14.07.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 B 148/05 R | 29.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13/10 KR 526/01 | 14.03.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8/14 KR 399/03 | 14.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 119/05 | 27.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 12. April 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 1427/03 | 21.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 641/04 | 01.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 AL 1630/01 | 06.08.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 20/06 WA | 24.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 219/02 | 03.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 354/05 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 218/02 | 03.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 353/05 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 24 U 129/03 | 07.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 210/05 | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 72/04 | 20.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 205/04 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 104/96 | 22.01.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 112/98 | 12.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 382/01 | 03.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 110/04 | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 1154/03 A | 12.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 724/04 | 14.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 10 RJ 190/02 | 08.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 715/04 | 24.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 2 R 363/05 A | 19.05.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 497/05 | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 14 RJ 195/99 | 06.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 444/04 | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 RJ 651/03 | 05.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 263/04 | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 9 RJ 673/02 | 02.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 210/04 | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 RJ 1126/01 | 06.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 R 180/03 | 12.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. April 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 38/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-38-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-38-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 33/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-33-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-33-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 41/06 RH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-41-06-rh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-41-06-rh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 128/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-128-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-128-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 228/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-228-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-228-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 V 6/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-v-6-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-v-6-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5/16 LW 5/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-16-lw-5-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-16-lw-5-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 148/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-148-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-148-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8/14 KR 399/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-14-kr-399-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-14-kr-399-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 119/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-119-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-119-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 641/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-641-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:35:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:35:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-641-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 20/06 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-20-06-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:35:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:35:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-20-06-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 354/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-354-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-354-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 353/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-353-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-353-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 210/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-210-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-210-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 205/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-205-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-205-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 112/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-112-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-112-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 110/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-110-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-110-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 724/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-724-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-724-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 715/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-715-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-715-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 497/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-497-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-497-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 444/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-444-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-444-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 263/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-263-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-263-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 210/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-210-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-210-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 R 180/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-r-180-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:34:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:34:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-r-180-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-04-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-04-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 38/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-38-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-38-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a2440736a978e38d3ba50c8a77e8bfc2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c3cc25dabf856a3bbc29a9083b16dd73:0.18771100 1756326141 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.