Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 113/04 | 17.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 B 1178/05 KR | 03.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 194/03 | 13.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 B 1030/05 KA | 05.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 30 AL 2841/04 | 21.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 1135/05 | 22.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 256/02 | 15.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 58/04 | 09.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 5 RA 7414/02 | 26.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 85/03 | 09.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 683/00 | 23.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 54/02 | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 39 RA 2093/97 | 09.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 26/01 | 10.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Kiel | 29.07.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 15/05 R | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. März 2006 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 34 AL 422/00 | 31.10.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 54/02 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 23/05 R | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. März 2006 |
Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 5 AL 65/04 | 12.05.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 77/05 | 24.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 AL 154/04 | 28.04.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 83/05 | 10.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Trier | S 5 KR 90/04 Tr | 02.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 40/05 | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 29. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 (32) AL 151/04 | 07.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 28. März 2006 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 47 AS 712/05 ER | 22.12.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 23/06 ER | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 119/02 | 26.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 35/03 | 13.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/05 R | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. März 2006 |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 V 219/99 | 12.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 V 2/04 | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9a V 47/05 B | 16.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. März 2006 |
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 KR 265/99 | 17.04.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 38/02 | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 12/05 R | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. März 2006 |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 319/05 ER | 12.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 210/05 KR | 16.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 10 RA 247/03 | 19.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 31/05 | 14.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. März 2006 | |
Privat: Sozialgericht Stendal | S 4 AY 41/05 ER | 11.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 B 11/05 AY ER | 03.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 118/05 ER | 28.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 B 2/05 SO ER | 24.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 13 U 194/00 | 18.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 97/02 | 11.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 19 (29) RJ 96/01 | 18.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 RJ 78/03 | 24.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 9 AL 605/01 | 08.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 55/03 | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 | |
Privat: Sozialgericht Stendal | S 6 RA 12/03 | 22.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 RA 370/04 | 02.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. März 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 B 1178/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-b-1178-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-b-1178-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 1030/05 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-1030-05-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-1030-05-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 1135/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-1135-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-1135-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 58/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-58-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-58-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 85/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-85-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-85-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 54/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-54-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-54-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 26/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-26-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-26-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83476 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11a AL 15/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11a-al-15-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11a-al-15-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11a AL 23/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11a-al-23-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11a-al-23-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 77/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-77-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-77-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 83/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-83-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-83-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 40/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-40-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-40-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 (32) AL 151/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-32-al-151-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-32-al-151-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 23/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-23-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-23-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 4/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-4-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-4-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9a V 47/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9a-v-47-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9a-v-47-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 12/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-12-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-12-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 210/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-210-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-210-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 31/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-31-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-31-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 B 11/05 AY ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-b-11-05-ay-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-b-11-05-ay-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 B 2/05 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-b-2-05-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-b-2-05-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 97/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-97-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-97-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 78/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-78-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-78-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 55/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-55-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-55-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 370/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-370-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-370-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 B 1178/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-b-1178-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-b-1178-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0b6d1d06290049722db5e2a022b4804e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:98217eb7024f1af90336d6366d8cad61:0.13318600 1756290162 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.