| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 213/15 | 13.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 667/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 11. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 303/16 | 17.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 73/17 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 7/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 303/16 | 17.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 73/17 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 7/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 P 4284/18 | 29.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 48/20 | 11.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 3118/17 | 13.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 985/19 | 11.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 7 R 925/18 | 31.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 1223/20 | 11.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 SB 888/19 | 15.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2455/20 B | 03.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 509/15 | 29.03.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1121/17 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 1653/12 | 30.08.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1427/16 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 465/15 | 04.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 8. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 49/16 | 15.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 8. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 520/14 | 13.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 8. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 R 641/14 | 15.06.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 496/15 | 20.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 AS 498/15 | 08.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 565/17 | 10.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 81/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 KR 3/20 | 26.11.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 8. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 AS 498/15 | 08.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 565/17 | 10.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 81/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 1/20 | 11.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 13/20 B | 27.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 SF 1/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 139/15 | 24.11.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 54/18 | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 17 AS 768/13 | 14.10.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 52/16 | 28.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 186/20 ER | 02.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 32/20 B ER | 09.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 485/19 ER | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 8/20 B ER | 25.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 158/19 ER | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 42/19 B ER | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 36 AL 191/19 ER (SG Lübeck) | 27.01.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 27/20 B ER | 28.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 3/18 WA, S 12 KA 102 b. 104/15 u. S 12 KA | 25.04.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 7. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 8 AS 167/20 ER | 18.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 7. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 213/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-213-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-213-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 73/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-73-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-73-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 73/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-73-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-73-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 48/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-48-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-48-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 985/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-985-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-985-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1223/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1223-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1223-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2455/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2455-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2455-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1121/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1121-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1121-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1427/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1427-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1427-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 465/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-465-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-465-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 49/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-49-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-49-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 520/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-520-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-520-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 641/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-641-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-641-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AS 498/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-as-498-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-as-498-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 3/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-3-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-3-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 565/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-565-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-565-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 13/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-13-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-13-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 54/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-54-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-54-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 52/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-52-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-52-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 32/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-32-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-32-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 8/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-8-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-8-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 42/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-42-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-42-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 27/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-27-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-27-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 3/18 WA, S 12 KA 102 b. 104/15 u. S 12 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-3-18-wa-s-12-ka-102-b-104-15-u-s-12-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-3-18-wa-s-12-ka-102-b-104-15-u-s-12-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 167/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-167-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-167-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 213/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-213-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-213-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fd13e5fc8305cff7267bc02a8a1b5051 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b55ef2c16724951c521e7f0190b5ca19:0.55492200 1751127465 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.