| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 2 SF 23/05 SK | 25.01.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 88/06 SF SK | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 2244/03 | 16.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AL 69/05 | 10.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 37/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 107/05 | 24.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 AY 9/06 | 06.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 53/05 | 31.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 SO 8/06 ER | 15.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 R 139/05 | 09.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 31/06 ER | 21.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 B 13/06 KA ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KA 691/05.ER | 23.01.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 AY 18/05 ER | 15.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 24 SB 4/05 | 28.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 (27) AS 218/05 | 07.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 4 KN 85/05 U | 06.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 KN 15/05 U | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 62/05 ER | 10.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 AS 98/05 ER | 21.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 B 100/05 AS ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 8 KA 612/01 Mz | 19.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KA 13/04 | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 AS 258/05 ER | 15.12.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 18/06 ER | 07.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 1015/05 ER | 23.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 390/05 ER KR | 21.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 20. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 5 KR 77/04 Tr | 12.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 25/05 | 19.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 20. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 8 KA 224/00 Mz | 08.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KA 37/05 | 02.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 20. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | B 12 KR 10/04 R | 12.05.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 10/04 R | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 29 RA 1623/97 | 21.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 220/04 B | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 RA 174/01 | 11.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 519/04 | 30.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 18/04 R | 24.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 R 693/03 | 16.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 53/06 ER | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. März 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 88/06 SF SK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-88-06-sf-sk [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-88-06-sf-sk/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 89 KR 2244/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-89-kr-2244-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-89-kr-2244-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 69/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-69-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-69-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141548 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 107/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-107-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-107-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AY 9/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ay-9-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ay-9-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 53/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-53-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-53-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 8/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-8-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-8-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 R 139/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-r-139-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-r-139-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 31/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-31-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-31-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 691/05.ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-691-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-691-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AY 18/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-ay-18-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-ay-18-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 SB 4/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-sb-4-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-sb-4-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 (27) AS 218/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-27-as-218-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-27-as-218-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KN 85/05 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kn-85-05-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kn-85-05-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 62/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-62-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-62-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 98/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-98-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-98-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 13/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-13-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-13-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 18/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-18-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-18-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 390/05 ER KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-390-05-er-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-390-05-er-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 25/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-25-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-25-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 37/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-37-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-37-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 10/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-10-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:18:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:18:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-10-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 220/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-220-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-220-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 18/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-18-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-18-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 53/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-53-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:31:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:31:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-53-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 88/06 SF SK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-88-06-sf-sk [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-88-06-sf-sk/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a3a9ed8a10cbbf9e7b0f48dd61fc2b82 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c2567e021e38410569cf98e9c2f37d01:0.13804800 1756126356 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.