| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 KR 104/03 | 14.12.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 30/06 KR | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 360/05 ER | 25.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 114/05 | 05.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 269/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 24/06 | 07.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 68/06 ER | 09.03.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 14 R 4499/02 | 09.03.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 261/02 | 20.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 1 U 209/01 Ko | 10.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 110/04 | 23.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 16. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 109/05 | 07.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 103/05 | 23.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 KN 177/03 | 25.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 95/05 | 24.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 RJ 123/04 | 08.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 10 U 110/05 | 06.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 110/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 14 KA 126/01 | 06.11.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 14/04 R | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 1319/04 | 26.01.2005 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/05 R | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 KA 13/01 | 15.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 197/01 | 07.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 60/03 R | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 85/98 W99 | 13.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 172/01 | 21.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/04 R | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 1843/00 | 26.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 280/01 | 20.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 33/03 R | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 2 RA 272/00 | 23.11.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 RA 280/02 | 06.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 43/03 R | 18.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 1604/01 | 17.08.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 AL 232/04 | 08.03.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 211/04 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AR 57/05 KR | 10.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 2 AL 1080/02 | 16.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 286/04 | 15.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 KR 195/01 | 04.12.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 130/04 | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 15. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 RJ 167/03 | 04.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 15. März 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 30/06 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-30-06-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-30-06-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 360/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-360-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-360-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 114/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-114-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-114-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 24/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-24-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-24-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 68/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-68-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-68-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 4499/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-4499-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-4499-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 261/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-261-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-261-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 110/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-110-04-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-110-04-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 109/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-109-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-109-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 103/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-103-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-103-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KN 177/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kn-177-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kn-177-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 95/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-95-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-95-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 RJ 123/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-rj-123-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-rj-123-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133216 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 110/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-110-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-110-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 14/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-14-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-14-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 60/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-60-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-60-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 18/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-18-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-18-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 33/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-33-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-33-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 43/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-43-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-43-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AL 232/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-al-232-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-al-232-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AR 57/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ar-57-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ar-57-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 286/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-286-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-286-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145459 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 130/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-130-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-130-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 RJ 167/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-rj-167-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-rj-167-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 30/06 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-30-06-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-30-06-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 706390a260517fdaee28febea7a98fea [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0c41cf14b8f3e43c0b73a49a912d60aa:0.51345300 1756126355 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.