| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 16 RA 1108/03 | 12.10.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 7. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 14 KN 108/03 | 14.03.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 307/05 KN | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RA 882/02 | 21.10.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RA 39/04 | 13.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 14 KN 139/01 | 24.06.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KN 52/03 | 11.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 10 RA 38/03 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RA 60/03 | 24.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 15 KA 850/01 | 10.03.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 17/05 | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 716/05 | 26.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 6. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 AS 507/05 | 03.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2023/05 | 30.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 19 KR 56/02 | 17.05.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 89/04 | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 9 KR 185/03 | 23.11.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 18/05 | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 353/04 | 06.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 8 AL 888/02 | 29.12.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 31/05 | 30.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 Kn 150/95 | 02.04.1996 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 KN 56/96 | 20.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 4/00 R | 13.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 (25) KA 221/99 | 21.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 8/02 | 25.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 73/04 R | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 1 RA 97/01 | 30.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 RA 63/03 | 29.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 15/04 R | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 RA 5/03 | 20.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 RA 28/04 | 28.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 13/04 R | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 31 RA 1393/01 | 15.03.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 RA 95/02 | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 5/03 R | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 7 U 1438/99 | 16.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 1398/03 | 17.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 21/04 R | 13.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 89/00 | 16.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 128/03 | 16.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 30/04 R | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 1 KR 133/00 | 05.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 21/02 | 28.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 26/04 R | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 52/03 | 30.03.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 71/04 R | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 RJ 69/01 | 08.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 93/02 | 25.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 41/04 R | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 RJ 742/02 | 16.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 6 RJ 122/03 | 24.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 35/05 R | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 68/01 | 28.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KA 42/03 | 21.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 68/04 R | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. März 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 9 AL 2099/03 | 10.08.2004 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 911/04 | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 2. März 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3197 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3197 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3197 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 79900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 RA 1108/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ra-1108-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:00:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:00:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ra-1108-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 307/05 KN [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-307-05-kn [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-307-05-kn/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 39/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-39-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-39-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KN 52/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kn-52-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kn-52-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RA 60/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ra-60-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ra-60-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 17/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-17-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-17-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 716/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-716-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-716-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2023/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2023-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:43:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:43:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2023-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 18/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-18-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-18-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SB 353/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-sb-353-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:27:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:27:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-sb-353-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 31/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-31-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-31-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 4/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-4-00-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-4-00-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 73/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-73-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-73-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 15/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-15-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-15-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 13/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-13-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-13-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 21/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-21-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-21-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 30/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-30-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-30-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 26/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-26-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-26-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 71/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-71-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-71-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 41/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-41-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-41-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 35/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-35-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-35-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 68/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-68-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-68-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 911/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-911-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-911-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 RA 1108/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ra-1108-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:00:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:00:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ra-1108-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3bbd82ea288090324dc21d2544d0e836 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6666739847dfd5191bbef9347eee8da7:0.99407200 1756081385 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.