| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 U 735/21 | 13.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 450/22 | 07.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 AS 3570/21 | 14.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2126/23 | 24.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 U 2131/21 | 04.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 708/22 | 27.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 19 SB 2544/20 | 17.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 1175/22 | 14.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 R 1625/20 | 07.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2314/22 | 03.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 EG 1/20 | 07.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 9. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 SO 162/22 | 14.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 41 R 225/22 | 28.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 78/24 | 05.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 42 KR 438/19 | 08.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 9. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 SF 387/19 DS | 10.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 18/20 DS | 14.06.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 | ||
| S 14 R 587/22 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2591/23 | 08.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 12 VE 35/13 | 02.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 1/20 | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/23 B | 21.03.2024 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 12 VE 35/13 | 02.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 1/20 | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/23 B | 21.03.2024 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 BA 14/24 ER | 14.05.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 53/24 B ER | 29.07.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 SF 116/21 EK SB | 31.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/23 R | 21.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 U 325/17 | 04.10.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 373/18 | 12.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/21 R | 21.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 177/17 | 26.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 47/21 | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/22 R | 23.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 R 386/16 | 15.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 R 67/19 | 05.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 12/22 R | 22.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 34 R 789/14 | 28.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 280/18 | 23.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 7/22 R | 22.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 50 R 287/18 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 318/19 | 05.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 3/23 R | 22.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 55 AS 473/20 | 07.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 192/22 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 7. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 88 KR 1497/19 | 21.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 261/23 | 14.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 7. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 R 587/22 | 05.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2591/23 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 542/17 | 28.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 68/20 | 24.04.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 19 SB 7/18 | 27.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 SB 125/20 | 16.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 32 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 32 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 32 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 450/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-450-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-450-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2126/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2126-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2126-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 708/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-708-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-708-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 1175/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-1175-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-1175-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2314/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2314-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2314-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-1-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-1-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SO 162/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-so-162-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-so-162-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 78/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-78-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-78-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 KR 438/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-kr-438-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-kr-438-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 18/20 DS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-18-20-ds [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-18-20-ds/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2591/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2591-23-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2591-23-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 VE 35/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ve-35-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ve-35-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 VE 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ve-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ve-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 53/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-53-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-53-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 1/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-1-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-1-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 12/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-12-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-12-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 7/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-7-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-7-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 3/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-3-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-3-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 192/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-192-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-192-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 261/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-261-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-261-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2591/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2591-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2591-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 542/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-542-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-542-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 125/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-125-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-125-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 450/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-450-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-450-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 551967c82da10502be2149a85e196d9b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d02a2d8f11f82690516ca7cd7bac2394:0.35141700 1745175831 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.