| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AS 1377/19 | 07.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 212/20 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 3361/19 | 29.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1204/20 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 338/15 | 22.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 159/19 | 08.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 SF 41/20 PG | 07.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 7. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 26 SB 965/17 | 18.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 7. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 57 KR 725/16 | 29.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 R 341/16 ER | 16.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 386/16 B ER | 08.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 7. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 SO 133/20 ER | 10.07.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 67/20 B ER | 10.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 17 AS 1746/17 | 20.11.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1077/18 | 28.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 AL 65/15 | 02.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 111/19 | 11.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 272/16 | 16.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 24/17 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 342/16 | 29.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 17/19 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 21/15 | 19.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 26/17 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 AS 332/15 | 26.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 354/18 | 01.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 486/15 | 09.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 835/17 | 16.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7 KR 825/19 ER | 04.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 256/19 B ER | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 6. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 11 KR 20/14 | 22.11.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 66/17 | 22.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 16/20 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 36/13 | 03.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 150/16 | 03.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 236/17 B | 01.03.2018 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 68/14 | 18.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 168/16 | 12.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 1889/19 WA | 14.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 5. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 215/13 | 27.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 109/17 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/20 B | 07.07.2020 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 225/15 | 21.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 79/17 | 11.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/19 R | 25.06.2019 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 38/09 | 14.02.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 111/14 | 23.01.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 37/17 B | 13.07.2017 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 33/20 E | 30.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 5. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 467/20 | 06.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 5. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 320 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 320 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 320 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 7975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 212/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-212-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-212-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1204/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1204-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1204-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 159/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-159-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-159-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SF 41/20 PG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-sf-41-20-pg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-sf-41-20-pg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 SB 965/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-sb-965-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-sb-965-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 57 KR 725/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-57-kr-725-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-57-kr-725-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 341/16 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-341-16-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-341-16-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 67/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-67-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-67-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1077/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1077-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1077-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 111/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-111-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-111-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 24/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-24-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-24-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 17/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-17-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-17-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 26/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-26-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-26-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 354/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-354-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-354-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 486/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-486-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-486-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 825/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-825-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-825-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 66/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-66-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-66-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 36/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-36-13-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:35:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:35:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-36-13-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 68/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-68-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-68-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 1889/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-1889-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-1889-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 215/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-215-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-215-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 225/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-225-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-225-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 38/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-38-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-38-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 33/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-33-20-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-33-20-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 467/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-467-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-467-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 212/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-212-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:14:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:14:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-212-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 73bcac15d0fd86a2c2a4f5e2a61b4d0f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:72a8c0def12cc5ab5a71826c8d9844cf:0.68292500 1751127865 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.