| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 5 AL 5878/04 | 05.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 AL 183/05 | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 1 RA 4556/96 W05 | 24.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 1057/05 | 29.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 12 AL 678/01 | 20.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 5/04 | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 21 RJ 825/00 | 24.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RJ 29/03 | 09.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 1 RJ 351/04 | 02.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 B 125/05 R PKH | 24.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 86 KR 1260/05 ER | 22.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 B 1039/05 KR ER | 01.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 10 RA 707/03 | 21.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 R 31/05 | 31.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 17 RA 870/03 | 22.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 B 77/05 R PKH | 05.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 2307/05 | 30.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1325/05 | 10.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 AL 3931/03 | 07.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 AL 175/05 | 29.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 6952/03 | 24.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 AL 77/05 | 24.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 86 KR 3360/04 | 17.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 B 1003/05 SF | 11.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 8 RJ 563/03 | 10.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RJ 104/04 | 29.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 14 RA 1115/03 | 28.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 RA 315/04 | 19.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 26 RJ 1744/03 | 06.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 RJ 8/04 | 15.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 85 KR 3245/00 | 04.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 56/03 | 15.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1622/02 | 19.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 24/03 | 25.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 13 RA 1472/01 | 23.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 118/02 | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 86 KR 713/00 | 13.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 64/02 | 15.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 123/98 | 23.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 U 9/01 | 21.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 13 V 10/03 | 07.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 V 3/05 | 21.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 RA 133/03 ZV | 19.05.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 344/04 | 16.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 2 BL 1/01 | 04.03.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 BL 6/03 | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 U 252/01 | 25.03.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 89/03 | 03.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 RA 917/01 | 08.04.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 391/03 | 26.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3201 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3201 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3201 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 183/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-183-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-183-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 1057/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-1057-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-1057-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 5/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-5-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-5-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RJ 29/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-rj-29-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-rj-29-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 B 125/05 R PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-b-125-05-r-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-b-125-05-r-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 1039/05 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-1039-05-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-1039-05-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 R 31/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-r-31-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-r-31-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 B 77/05 R PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-b-77-05-r-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-b-77-05-r-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1325/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1325-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1325-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AL 175/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-al-175-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-al-175-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 77/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-77-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-77-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 1003/05 SF [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-1003-05-sf [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-1003-05-sf/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RJ 104/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-rj-104-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-rj-104-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 RA 315/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-ra-315-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-ra-315-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RJ 8/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-rj-8-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-rj-8-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 56/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-56-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-56-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 24/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-24-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-24-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 118/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-118-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-118-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 64/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-64-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-64-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 U 9/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-u-9-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-u-9-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 3/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-3-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-3-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 344/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-344-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-344-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 BL 6/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-bl-6-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-bl-6-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 89/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-89-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-89-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 391/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-391-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-391-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 183/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-183-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:03:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:03:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-183-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a753ef9fcda79223f5318bb9cc8bb482 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1cb0d872fee3aa9fa5af466385cbe049:0.05427100 1756040329 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.