| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 2 BL 7/00 | 21.01.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 BL 5/03 | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 RA 1173/03 ZV | 25.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 160/05 | 24.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 RA 142/01 | 02.10.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 389/04 ZVW | 21.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 195/00 | 12.10.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 159/01 | 21.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 7 U 259/00 | 19.09.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 119/02 | 21.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 1099/01 | 09.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 24. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 194/05 ER | 20.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 24. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 6015/03 | 30.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 24. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 7 U 119/01 | 25.04.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 70/02 | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 26 U 123/96 | 02.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 24/01 | 22.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 8 P 82/03 | 26.04.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 P 9/05 | 13.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 43 SB 146/05 | 03.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 23 KN 243/05 U | 14.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 30 V 4/03 | 23.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1100/04 | 25.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 B 115/04 KR | 03.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 12 RA 16/01 | 18.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 RA 51/03 | 27.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 4 AL 387/02 | 05.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 207/03 | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KR 707/01 | 14.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 28/03 | 20.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 3952/01 | 18.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 AL 101/02 -14 | 01.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 RJ 2576/98 | 14.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RJ 26/01 | 30.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 66/02 | 06.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 22. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 37/05 | 08.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 (32) AL 385/04 | 08.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 22. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 41/06 ER | 10.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 22. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 (17) AS 245/05 | 13.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Februar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 BL 5/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-bl-5-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-bl-5-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 160/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-160-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-160-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 389/04 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-389-04-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-389-04-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 159/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-159-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-159-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 119/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-119-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-119-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 RA 1099/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ra-1099-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ra-1099-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 194/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-194-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-194-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 6015/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-6015-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-6015-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 70/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-70-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-70-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 24/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-24-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:49:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:49:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-24-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 P 9/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-p-9-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-p-9-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 SB 146/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-sb-146-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-sb-146-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KN 243/05 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kn-243-05-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kn-243-05-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 V 4/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-v-4-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-v-4-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 115/04 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-115-04-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-115-04-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 51/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-51-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-51-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 207/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-207-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-207-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 28/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-28-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-28-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 101/02 -14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-101-02-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-101-02-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 26/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-26-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:02:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:02:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-26-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 71 KA 66/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-71-ka-66-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-71-ka-66-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 37/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-37-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-37-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 (32) AL 385/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-32-al-385-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-32-al-385-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 41/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-41-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-41-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 (17) AS 245/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-17-as-245-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-17-as-245-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 BL 5/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-bl-5-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-bl-5-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3fbf2de682761028fe2b5e29a069fdb0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a32649332b9fa7fcc3ef8d42e00572f2:0.05624200 1756026653 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.