| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 Bl 4/97 | 25.06.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 16/04 ZVW | 17.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 KA 1867/01 | 16.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 152/03 | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 KA 121/02 | 16.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 134/03 | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 BL 15/02 | 18.02.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 9/05 | 06.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 14 AS 482/05 ER | 04.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 B 741/05 AS ER | 18.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 51 AS 344/05 ER | 14.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 612/05 AS ER | 11.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 BL 4/97 | 25.06.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 2/99 | 28.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 SF 2/03 R | 26.10.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | 25.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 9/04 R | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | 10.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 57/03 R | 05.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 22.06.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 39/04 R | 05.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 27.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 04.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 56/04 R | 18.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RJ 118/02 | 26.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 RJ 10/04 | 14.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 289/04 B | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | S 1 RA 271/02 | 01.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 4 RA 94/03 | 08.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 3/05 R | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 347/00 | 28.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 13/03 | 19.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 38/04 R | 10.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 U 507/02 | 23.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3923/02 | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/05 R | 13.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 13 KR 119/01 | 20.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 90/04 | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/05 B | 20.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 13 RA 3389/03 | 24.06.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 RA 119/04 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 6/05 R | 18.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 6 P 224/01 | 18.09.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 P 1091/02 | 19.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 10/04 R | 10.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 28 AL 798/04 | 26.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 138/05 | 27.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AS 1393/05 ER | 23.01.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 10. Februar 2006 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 SF 1028/05 | 05.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 344/04 | 12.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 40/05 | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 19 R 3012/05 ER | 29.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 B 1604/05 R ER | 18.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 346/03 | 10.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 36/05 | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 8 AL 543/02 | 07.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 167/04 | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 16/04 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-16-04-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-16-04-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 152/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-152-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-152-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 134/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-134-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-134-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 9/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-9-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-9-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 741/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-741-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-741-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 612/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-612-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-612-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 2/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-2-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:30:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:30:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-2-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 9/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-9-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-9-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 57/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-57-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-57-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 39/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-39-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-39-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 56/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-56-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-56-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 289/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-289-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-289-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 3/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-3-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-3-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 38/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-38-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-38-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 6/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-6-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-6-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 6/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-6-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-6-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 10/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-10-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-10-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 138/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-138-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-138-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 1393/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-1393-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-1393-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 1028/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-1028-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:01:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:01:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-1028-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 40/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-40-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:01:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:01:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-40-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 1604/05 R ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-1604-05-r-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:01:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:01:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-1604-05-r-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 36/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-36-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:01:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:01:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-36-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 167/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-167-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 01:01:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 00:01:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-167-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 16/04 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-16-04-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:29:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:29:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-16-04-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ca652b0dc61cf0fcd0e9be659c3ac220 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:da338834ac195b3a712bdc93a61ec2c5:0.08210800 1756001083 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.