| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 U 2784/04 | 03.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1619/05 | 20.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 KA 4671/02 | 21.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1484/05 | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/06 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 AL 429/03 | 29.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 1025/04 | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KA 1959/00 | 25.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1002/03 | 02.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 49/05 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 U 741/04 | 24.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 719/05 | 28.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 VG 3245/04 | 07.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 145/05 | 15.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AL 776/01 | 24.06.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 187/03 | 27.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 2 AL 6/04 | 26.10.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 105/04 | 21.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 16 AS 219/05 ER | 15.12.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1/06 ER | 30.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 54/01 | 22.01.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 163/02 | 06.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 3429/04 | 30.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 7. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 965/05 | 30.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 7. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 14 KN 478/03 | 03.02.2006 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 7. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 KR 264/04 | 25.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Bayreuth | 7. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 1 P 89/00 | 11.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Bayreuth | 7. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 17 V 256/03 | 26.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 6. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 269/04 | 05.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 24/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 6. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 AL 30/05 | 09.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 6. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 U 249/01 Mz | 20.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 39/04 | 22.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 6. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 17 SB 95/03 | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 87/05 | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 124/04 | 30.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 R 10/05 | 24.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AS 60/05 | 11.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 AS 53/05 | 27.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1619/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1619-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1619-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 1484/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-1484-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-1484-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 1025/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-1025-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-1025-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 1002/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-1002-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-1002-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 719/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-719-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-719-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 145/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-145-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-145-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 187/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-187-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-187-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 105/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-105-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-105-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:12:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:12:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 163/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-163-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-163-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 R 3429/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-r-3429-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-r-3429-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 R 965/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-r-965-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-r-965-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KN 478/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kn-478-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kn-478-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 264/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-264-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-264-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 P 89/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-p-89-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-p-89-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 V 256/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-v-256-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-v-256-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 269/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-269-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-269-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AL 30/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-al-30-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-al-30-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 39/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-39-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-39-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SB 95/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-sb-95-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-sb-95-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 87/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-87-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-87-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 124/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-124-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-124-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 10/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-10-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-10-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 60/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-60-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-60-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 53/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-53-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-53-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1619/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1619-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1619-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8940b30c5ea9abdb17464039dd6fd7df [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8be2dcbec0892d981f5d35b9e9f05308:0.68552400 1755814369 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.