| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 389/18 | 06.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 5. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AL 229/20 | 27.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 5. Januar 2021 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 13 U 82/13 | 16.07.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 213/15 | 12.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/18 BH | 05.09.2019 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 86/17 | 07.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 118/18 | 11.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 71/19 B | 19.06.2019 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 U 119/06 | 22.09.2009 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 159/15 | 21.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 153/17 | 27.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 188/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 31 U 168/13 | 27.10.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 3/18 | 13.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/20 BH | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7 KR 438/18 | 11.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 282/19 | 23.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 R 84/17 | 28.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 27/18 | 06.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 R 652/16 | 14.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 14/18 | 05.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 215/13 | 27.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 109/17 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/20 B | 07.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 13 U 82/13 | 16.07.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 213/15 | 12.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/18 BH | 05.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 220/14 | 07.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 208/17 | 14.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 30/17 | 07.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 262/18 | 13.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 30/17 | 07.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 262/18 | 13.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 8/14 | 27.01.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 368/16 | 10.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 225/15 | 21.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 79/17 | 11.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/19 R | 25.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 86/17 | 07.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 118/18 | 11.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 71/19 B | 19.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 U 119/06 | 22.09.2009 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 159/15 | 21.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 3 U 33/13 | 30.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 189/16 | 21.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 32 U 14/14 | 20.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 94/17 | 18.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 980/12 | 05.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 3/15 | 27.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 36/13 | 03.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 150/16 | 03.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 236/17 B | 01.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 131/15 | 15.08.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 205/16 | 07.08.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 68/14 | 18.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 168/16 | 12.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2021 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 321 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 321 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 321 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 389/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-389-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-389-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AL 229/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-al-229-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-al-229-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 U 82/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-u-82-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-u-82-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 86/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-86-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:21:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:21:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-86-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 119/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-119-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:18:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:18:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-119-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 188/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-188-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-188-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 282/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-282-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-282-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-27-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-27-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 14/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-14-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-14-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 109/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-109-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-109-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 213/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-213-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-213-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 208/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-208-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-208-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 262/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-262-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-262-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 262/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-262-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-262-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 368/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-368-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-368-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 79/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-79-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-79-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 118/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-118-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-118-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 159/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-159-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-159-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 189/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-189-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-189-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 94/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-94-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-94-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 3/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-3-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-3-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 150/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-150-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:44:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:44:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-150-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 205/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-205-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-205-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 168/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-168-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-168-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2021-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2021-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 389/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-389-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-389-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b079d4345600e6a6ba8bbc1170032444 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7e5caa978e735d2e40359ea7c736ac0e:0.91484900 1751153471 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.