| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 80/05 | 08.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 7/05 | 09.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 38/05 | 19.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 SO 225/05 ER | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KA 674/05 ER | 12.12.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 2. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 1181/05 | 23.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 3061/05 | 09.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 17 VG 100/05 | 18.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 48/05 | 12.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 KA 9/05 | 15.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AL 454/04 ER | 02.04.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 116/04 ER | 17.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | 07.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 5/04 R | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/05 B | 13.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 KA 332/99 | 06.03.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 19/03 | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 94/03 B | 15.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 1 RA 1472/01 | 17.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 907/02 | 26.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 9/03 R | 24.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 KR 188/01 | 24.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3123/02 | 20.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 27/04 R | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 225/00 | 04.11.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 35/04 R | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 P 88/01 | 30.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 P 29/03 | 08.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 4/04 R | 01.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 19 KR 796/99 | 06.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 111/01 | 15.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/04 R | 27.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 4 AL 136/03 | 09.09.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 100/04 | 02.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 28 SO 23/05 ER | 24.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 31. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 562/05 ER | 22.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 31. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 1 U 3343/01 | 08.09.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 30. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 SO 5122/05 ER | 29.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 30. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 6 AS 260/05 | 08.12.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 30. Januar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3210 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3210 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3210 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 80/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-80-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-80-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 7/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-7-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-7-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 38/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-38-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-38-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 225/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-225-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-225-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 674/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-674-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-674-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 1181/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-1181-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-1181-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 3061/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-3061-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-3061-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 VG 100/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-vg-100-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-vg-100-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 48/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-48-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-48-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KA 9/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ka-9-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:26:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:26:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ka-9-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 116/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-116-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-116-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 5/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-5-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:17:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:17:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-5-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-05-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-05-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 94/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-94-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-94-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 9/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-9-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-9-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 27/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-27-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-27-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 35/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-35-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-35-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 4/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-4-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-4-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 100/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-100-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-100-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SO 23/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-so-23-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-so-23-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 562/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-562-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-562-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 3343/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-3343-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:29:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:29:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-3343-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SO 5122/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-so-5122-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-so-5122-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 260/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-260-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-260-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 80/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-80-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-80-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 501af030c2371749716f34db96b61737 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:980458b2c024536fdbf45375064a5d7e:0.77910100 1755808225 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.