| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 428/04 | 14.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 415/04 | 14.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 412/04 | 14.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 410/04 | 14.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 17 SO 192/05 | 14.12.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 27. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 5 SB 84/04 | 07.07.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 B 103/05 SB | 18.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30/9 KR 2810/02 | 20.01.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8/14 KR 334/04 | 20.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 105/05 ER | 06.07.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 132/05 AS | 23.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 21 AS 153/05 ER | 21.06.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 38/05 ER | 20.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 11 AL 468/04 ER | 24.06.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 234/04 ER | 11.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 26/05 ER | 23.02.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 14/05 ER | 11.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 867/01 | 12.11.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 33/04 | 21.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 KR 1751/05 | 19.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 26. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 SB 469/01 | 13.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Bayreuth | 26. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 4 U 124/00 | 12.01.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 18/04 | 24.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 386/05 | 17.01.2006 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 25. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 RJ 119/04 | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 4/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 24. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 AS 304/05 ER | 20.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 B 2/06 AS ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 24. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 RJ 5/04 | 24.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 24. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AL 518/02 | 11.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 AL 31/05 | 18.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 KR 64/05 | 28.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 23. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 RJ 2739/98 | 06.04.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 676/05 | 06.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 AL 285/05 ER | 25.10.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 B 654/05 AL ER | 21.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 10 LW 31/05 ER | 23.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 B 632/05 LW ER | 27.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 KR 277/05 ER | 22.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 B 613/05 KR ER | 30.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 428/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-428-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-428-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 415/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-415-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-415-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 412/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-412-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-412-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 410/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-410-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-410-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 192/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-192-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-192-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 103/05 SB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-103-05-sb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-103-05-sb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8/14 KR 334/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-14-kr-334-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-14-kr-334-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 132/05 AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-132-05-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-132-05-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 38/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-38-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-38-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 234/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-234-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-234-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 14/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-14-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-14-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 33/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-33-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-33-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1751/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1751-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1751-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SB 469/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sb-469-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sb-469-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 18/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-18-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-18-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 386/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-386-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-386-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 RJ 119/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-rj-119-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-rj-119-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 304/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-304-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-304-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 RJ 5/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-rj-5-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-rj-5-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AL 31/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-al-31-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-al-31-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 64/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-64-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-64-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 676/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-676-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-676-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 B 654/05 AL ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-b-654-05-al-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-b-654-05-al-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 B 632/05 LW ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-b-632-05-lw-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-b-632-05-lw-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 613/05 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-613-05-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-613-05-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 428/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-428-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-428-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e32d4b65712bd25bf6f54b6d819dc8cb [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:dedd2f03057ba8dbdeaf6562d247d78c:0.34717300 1755808226 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.