| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 11 VG 119/00 | 17.10.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 VG 7/02 | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 28 AS 94/05 ER | 19.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AL 1282/04 | 11.11.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 AS 5846/05 ER | 22.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 AL 3006/04 | 06.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 AL 3006/04 | 06.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 7 AR 37/05 ER PKH | 12.01.2006 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 58/03 | 22.02.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 116/05 | 30.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 R 4238/05 | 24.05.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 533/05 | 23.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 RJ 904/01 | 14.08.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 R 509/03 | 03.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 RJ 996/00 | 14.08.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 R 481/02 | 12.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 R 716/03 | 04.05.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 433/05 | 07.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 7 R 415/04 | 28.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 377/05 | 28.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 KR 475/04 | 28.02.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 69/05 | 08.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 KA 5503/01 | 27.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 KA 5012/04 | 09.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 1 AS 201/05 | 16.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 51/05 | 02.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | 26.11.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 14/05 R | 13.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | |||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | 29.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 9/04 R | 01.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 2 RJ 372/99 | 05.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RJ 191/00 | 30.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 10/04 R | 08.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Januar 2006 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 5 AS 32/05 ER | 21.04.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 94/05 AS-ER | 01.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 39/03 | 16.02.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 59/04 | 14.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 99/03 | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 7/06 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AL 60/04 | 25.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AL 60/04 | 25.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 9 RI 486/02 Sp | 05.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 B 192/05 KR | 03.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 13. Januar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3213 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3213 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3213 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 VG 7/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-vg-7-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-vg-7-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 AS 94/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-as-94-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-as-94-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AL 1282/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-al-1282-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-al-1282-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AS 5846/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-as-5846-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-as-5846-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AL 3006/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-al-3006-04-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-al-3006-04-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AL 3006/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-al-3006-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-al-3006-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AR 37/05 ER PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ar-37-05-er-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ar-37-05-er-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 116/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-116-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-116-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 533/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-533-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-533-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 R 509/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-r-509-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-r-509-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 R 481/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-r-481-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-r-481-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 433/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-433-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-433-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 377/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-377-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-377-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 69/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-69-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-69-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 5012/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-5012-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-5012-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 51/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-51-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-51-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 14/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-14-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-14-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 9/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-9-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:16:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:16:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-9-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 10/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-10-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-10-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 94/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-94-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-94-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 59/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-59-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-59-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 99/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-99-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-99-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AL 60/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-al-60-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-al-60-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AL 60/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-al-60-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-al-60-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 192/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-192-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-192-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 VG 7/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-vg-7-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-vg-7-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b6a1708235da503cf59e4f9f9ad2495a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f85973eea4ff86b7d15d3f05dfdc05c3:0.99619900 1755802389 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.