| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 393/02 | 11.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 44/03 | 25.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 15 KA 27/01 | 12.12.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 10/02 | 18.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 1 KR 130/02 | 08.12.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 10/05 | 19.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 AL 477/04 | 19.05.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 79/05 | 02.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 6628/03-16 | 30.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 4299/04 | 30.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 324/05 | 12.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 14 KN 589/03 | 02.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 B 10/05 R-KN-PKH | 15.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 AS 1588/05 ER | 16.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 404/05 ER AS | 29.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 SO 202/05 ER | 06.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 2. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 1332/05 ER | 14.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 2. Januar 2006 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 330/97 | 20.05.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 295/99 | 10.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 96/05 | 07.06.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 SO 17/05 | 12.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 RA 417/99 | 14.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 4151/04 | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 RA 108/01 | 13.12.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 4031/02 | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 26 RJ 747/03 | 29.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 385/04 | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 6 R 4320/04 | 04.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 R 302/05 | 30.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 12 RJ 446/01 | 18.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 208/03 | 27.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 KR 36/04 | 06.08.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 225/04 | 22.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 2 KR 52/03 | 10.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 181/03 | 29.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AL 708/02 | 04.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 227/05 | 15.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 4 R 259/02 | 15.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 793/05 ER | 19.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 R 583/03 | 28.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 794/05 ER | 28.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 AS 384/05 ER | 27.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 B 640/05 AS ER | 19.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 R 2527/05 ER | 12.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 B 573/05 R ER | 16.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2006 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 44/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-44-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-44-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 10/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-10-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-10-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 10/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-10-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-10-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 79/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-79-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-79-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 RA 6628/03-16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ra-6628-03-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ra-6628-03-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 RA 4299/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ra-4299-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ra-4299-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141119 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 324/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-324-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-324-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 10/05 R-KN-PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-10-05-r-kn-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-10-05-r-kn-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 404/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-404-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:48:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:48:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-404-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 SO 202/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-so-202-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-so-202-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AS 1332/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-as-1332-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-as-1332-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 295/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-295-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-295-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SO 17/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-so-17-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-so-17-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 4151/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-4151-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-4151-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 4031/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-4031-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-4031-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 385/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-385-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-385-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 R 302/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-r-302-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-r-302-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 208/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-208-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-208-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 225/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-225-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-225-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 181/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-181-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-181-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 227/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-227-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-227-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 793/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-793-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:28:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:28:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-793-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 794/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-794-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:27:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:27:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-794-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 640/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-640-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:27:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:27:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-640-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 B 573/05 R ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-b-573-05-r-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:27:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:27:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-b-573-05-r-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2006-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2006-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 44/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-44-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-44-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => eea509483094f39d3594e068f2058051 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4c1a6b56fd4ad970fea390b41a5ec00f:0.55267100 1755786144 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.