| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 66/05 ER | 01.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 51 AS 615/05 ER | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 AR 137/05 AS ER | 07.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 6 AS 153/05 ER | 14.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 163/05 AS-ER | 29.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 31 AS 309/05 ER | 14.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 144/05 AS-ER | 21.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Dezember 2005 | |
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 193/05 KR-ER | 13.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Dezember 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 19 RA 762/02 | 26.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 23. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 11 SO 151/05 ER | 06.10.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 B 306/05 SO ER | 12.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 1431/02 | 04.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 31/03 | 21.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 AL 180/99 | 18.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 AL 112/02 | 14.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 11 RA 435/01 | 08.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 RA 144/04 | 06.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 2 RJ 383/03 | 21.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RJ 94/04 | 19.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 8 RJ 182/03 | 10.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RJ 50/04 | 19.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 7018/05 ER | 29.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 1144/05 AS ER | 06.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 7 AL 344/03 | 19.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 185/04 | 01.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 SO 222/05 ER | 18.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 KA 129/04 | 23.11.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RA 497/03 | 12.09.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 19 KR 796/99 | 06.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 111/01 | 15.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/04 R | 27.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 157/05 ER | 08.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 671/04 | 04.05.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 20. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 9/05 | 06.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 20. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 133/05 ER | 13.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 20. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 3 KR 197/03 | 19.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 19/05 | 20.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 AL 1629/03 | 17.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 AL 71/04 | 22.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 85/02 | 11.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 51/03 | 20.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Dezember 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3223 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 66/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-66-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-66-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AR 137/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ar-137-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ar-137-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 163/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-163-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-163-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154395 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 144/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-144-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-144-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 193/05 KR-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-193-05-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-193-05-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 762/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-762-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-762-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 306/05 SO ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-306-05-so-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-306-05-so-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 31/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-31-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-31-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 AL 112/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-al-112-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-al-112-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 RA 144/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ra-144-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ra-144-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RJ 94/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-rj-94-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-rj-94-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RJ 50/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-rj-50-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-rj-50-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 1144/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-1144-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-1144-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 185/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-185-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-185-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 SO 222/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-so-222-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-so-222-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KA 129/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-ka-129-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-ka-129-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 RA 497/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ra-497-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ra-497-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 111/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-111-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:41:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:41:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-111-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 157/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-157-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-157-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 671/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-671-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-671-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 9/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-9-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:59:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:59:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-9-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 133/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-133-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-133-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 19/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-19-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-19-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AL 71/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-al-71-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-al-71-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 51/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-51-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-51-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 66/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-66-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-66-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 83c136d3176d5d3ac7ffe151fb01d9a4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:cbc3041a23775f64ca28dca9aa3eda90:0.23377400 1755771856 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.