| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 1243/02 A | 09.05.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 329/03 | 19.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 7 RJ 419/00 | 09.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 245/02 | 18.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 AL 443/02 | 04.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 122/04 | 18.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 KR 10/03 | 18.05.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 88/04 | 19.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 SB 294/05 ER | 07.07.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 12. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 460/05 | 06.12.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 12. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 5 AS 455/05 ER | 22.11.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 12. Dezember 2005 | ||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 2/02.Ko | 17.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | |||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 9/04.Ko | 27.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 22.07.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 28/03 R | 27.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 321/04 | 30.09.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 29/04 R | 24.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 259/98 | 12.07.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 KA 27/00 | 13.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 80/03 R | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 6 KN 5/04 | 25.05.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KN 13/04 | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 1/05 R | 21.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 15 KN 21/04 | 11.10.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 9/04 R | 21.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 540/05 ER | 11.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 540/05 ER | 11.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AL 281/05 | 23.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 243/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 RJ 296/04 | 23.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 9. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 2 ER 30/05 KA Mz | 12.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 ER 91/05 KA | 03.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 9. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 335/03 | 25.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 138/05 | 14.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 9. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 5563/03*54 | 03.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 11119/05 ER | 25.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 10613/05 ER | 28.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 343/05 ER | 23.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 8. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 KR 15/02 Mz | 18.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 96/04 | 06.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 8. Dezember 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3225 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3225 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3225 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 329/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-329-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-329-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 245/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-245-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-245-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 122/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-122-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-122-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 88/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-88-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-88-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 SB 294/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-sb-294-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-sb-294-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 460/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-460-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-460-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 455/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-455-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-455-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 2/02.Ko [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-2-02-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-2-02-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 9/04.Ko [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-9-04-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-9-04-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 28/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-28-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-28-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 29/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-29-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-29-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 80/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-80-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:15:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:15:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-80-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 1/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-1-05-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-1-05-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 9/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-9-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-9-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 540/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-540-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-540-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 540/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-540-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-540-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AL 281/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-al-281-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-al-281-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 RJ 296/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-rj-296-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-rj-296-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 ER 91/05 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-er-91-05-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-er-91-05-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 335/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-335-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:19:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:19:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-335-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 AL 5563/03*54 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-al-5563-0354 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-al-5563-0354/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 11119/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-11119-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-11119-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 10613/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-10613-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-10613-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 343/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-343-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-343-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 96/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-96-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-96-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 329/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-329-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-329-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 51a700f59e462a6ee3a4cfd57f998588 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a408112d23ea9b49e31dfa300c9ce3d5:0.82270400 1755762201 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.