| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 RA 4954/97 | 27.04.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 99/98 | 17.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 1615/02 | 28.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 136/03 | 04.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 2828/05 ER | 24.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 B 57/05 AS ER | 16.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 54 AL 283/03 | 21.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 AL 63/05 NZB | 27.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 4316/05 ER | 16.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 B 1024/05 AS ER | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 6 KN 115/01 | 09.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 KN 18/03 | 06.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 31 RJ 349/02 | 25.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 RJ 60/04 | 22.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 61 SO 521/05 ER | 21.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 B 355/05 ER SO | 18.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 1332/05 ER | 14.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 374/05 ER AS | 05.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 3019/05 | 26.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 345/05 ER | 21.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 77/05 ER | 17.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 2 U 191/03 | 20.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 B 36/05 U | 05.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 8 KR 229/01 | 25.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 167/04 | 06.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 19 AL 220/05 ER | 27.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Cottbus | 7. Dezember 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 1 U 5019/98 L | 28.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 180/03 | 09.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 RA 148/02 | 30.06.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 4172/03 | 23.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 12 RA 691/00 | 25.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 4142/01 | 20.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 10 RJ 431/02 | 12.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 678/04 | 08.11.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 1127/01 A | 12.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 649/04 | 19.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 RJ 708/02 | 27.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 645/03 | 26.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 RJ 2284/03 | 14.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 609/04 | 12.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 8 RJ 20/01 | 09.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 565/03 | 26.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 RJ 308/99 | 26.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 527/01 | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 12 RJ 511/03 | 24.06.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 508/04 | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Dezember 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3226 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 99/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-99-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-99-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100004 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 136/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-136-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-136-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 B 57/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-b-57-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-b-57-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 63/05 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-63-05-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-63-05-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 1024/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-1024-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-1024-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 KN 18/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-kn-18-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-kn-18-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 60/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-60-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-60-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 355/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-355-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:48:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:48:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-355-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 374/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-374-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:48:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:48:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-374-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 3019/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-3019-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-3019-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 345/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-345-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-345-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 77/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-77-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-77-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 36/05 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-36-05-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-36-05-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 167/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-167-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-167-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AL 220/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-al-220-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-al-220-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 180/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-180-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-180-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113512 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 4172/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-4172-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-4172-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 4142/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-4142-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-4142-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 678/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-678-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-678-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 649/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-649-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-649-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 645/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-645-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-645-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 609/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-609-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-609-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 565/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-565-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-565-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 527/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-527-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:25:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:25:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-527-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 508/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-508-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:24:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:24:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-508-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 100005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 99/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-99-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-99-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 430be11186619b05c6eb322ec51b2b2f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bdd25b30d3d73c5d92c86858482ea891:0.75304400 1755752303 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.