Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 3267/05 ER | 15.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3804/05 ER-B | 13.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 KR 1574/04 | 14.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3450/04 | 23.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 2300/05 ER-B | 30.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3421/05 ER-B | 22.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AY 591/05 ER | 04.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 3115/05 ER-B | 25.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 SO 2343/05 ER | 01.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2708/05 ER-B | 08.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 U 3433/03 | 18.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2535/04 | 08.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 EG 608/05 | 29.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 SF 2456/05 B | 24.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 V 890/02 | 13.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 V 2307/04 | 29.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 LW 4271/04 | 02.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 LW 2291/05 | 08.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 RA 2798/02 | 08.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2166/03 | 19.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 1376/02 | 29.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2127/03 | 22.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 18/05 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 AS 338/05 | 12.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AS 1995/05 | 02.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 AL 451/04 PKH-A | 30.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 1862/05 PKH-B | 06.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 R 4383/02 | 18.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 1766/05 | 20.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KR 1706/99 | 27.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1533/02 | 19.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 KR 1843/04 | 20.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1245/05 | 23.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 KR 3309/02 | 13.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1094/04 | 16.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 SF 2990/04 | 26.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 SF 863/05 B | 30.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 642/04 | 26.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 729/05 | 26.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2005 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 47/05 ER | 04.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 23. November 2005 | ||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AS 177/05 | 08.11.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 23. November 2005 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 22 AS 206/05 ER | 17.11.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23. November 2005 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 786/05 ER | 17.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2005 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 56 AS 773/05 ER | 08.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2005 | ||
Sozialgericht Trier | S 3 U 173/03 Tr | 24.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 U 273/04 | 11.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 23. November 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3233 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3233 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3233 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3804/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3804-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3804-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3450/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3450-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3450-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3421/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3421-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3421-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 3115/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-3115-05-er-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-3115-05-er-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 2708/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-2708-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-2708-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2535/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2535-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2535-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SF 2456/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sf-2456-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sf-2456-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 V 2307/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-v-2307-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-v-2307-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 LW 2291/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-lw-2291-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-lw-2291-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2166/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2166-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2166-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2127/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2127-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2127-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 1995/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-1995-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-1995-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1862/05 PKH-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1862-05-pkh-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1862-05-pkh-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 1766/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-1766-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-1766-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1533/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1533-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1533-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1245/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1245-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1245-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1094/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1094-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1094-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88590 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SF 863/05 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sf-863-05-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sf-863-05-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 729/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-729-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-729-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 47/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-47-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-47-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 177/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-177-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-177-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 206/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-206-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-206-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AS 786/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-as-786-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-as-786-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 56 AS 773/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-56-as-773-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-56-as-773-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 273/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-273-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-273-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3804/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3804-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:42:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:42:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3804-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 236c4d4db5566fd71251cd831d6e6929 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5a8a5ce2a4c52bc356e365c522e335fb:0.67768800 1755708692 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.