| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 65/04 | 26.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 14. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 317/98 | 03.05.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 8/00 | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 109/02 | 27.02.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 49/03 | 03.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AL 1617/04 | 12.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 265/04 | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 AS 820/05 ER | 17.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 260/05 ER AS | 22.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 50 AS 894/05 ER | 23.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 255/05 ER AS | 28.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 SO 476/05 ER | 16.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 B 308/05 ER SO | 27.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 RA 602/03 | 11.03.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 KR 236/04 Mz | 18.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 198/04 | 14.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 63/05 B | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 11. November 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 V 25/99 Mz | 29.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 V 16/04 | 07.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 3 RI 140/02 Tr | 20.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 RI 349/03 | 29.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 7 KR 525/03 | 12.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 KR 42/04 | 19.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 8 SB 680/03 Ko | 14.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 SB 54/05 | 19.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 88/05 ER | 09.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Potsdam | 11. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 73/05 ER | 04.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Potsdam | 11. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 69/05 ER | 08.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Potsdam | 11. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 45 AS 419/05 ER | 24.08.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 65/05 ER | 26.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 AL 656/00 | 21.02.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 328/03 WA | 27.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 3 Kr 453/94 | 27.03.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 49/96 | 26.03.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 VG 9/98 | 30.08.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 10/01 | 18.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 V 8/99 ZVW | 06.11.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 V 2/01 | 28.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 V 83/95 | 10.07.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 V 69/97 | 06.05.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 6 RA 2816/02*12 | 17.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 67/03 | 13.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 203/00 | 18.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 39/01 | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 52 AL 4799/03 | 24.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 AL 64/04 | 06.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3238 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 80925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 65/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-65-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-65-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 8/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-8-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-8-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 49/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-49-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-49-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 265/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-265-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-265-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 260/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-260-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-260-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 255/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-255-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-255-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 308/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-308-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:46:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:46:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-308-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 RA 602/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ra-602-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ra-602-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 198/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-198-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-198-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 V 16/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-v-16-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-v-16-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RI 349/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ri-349-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ri-349-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 42/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-42-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-42-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SB 54/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sb-54-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sb-54-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 88/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-88-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-88-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 73/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-73-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-73-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 69/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-69-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-69-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 65/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-65-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-65-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 328/03 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-328-03-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:30:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:30:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-328-03-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 49/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-49-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:47:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:47:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-49-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 10/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-10-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:31:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:31:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-10-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 V 2/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-v-2-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:28:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:28:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-v-2-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 V 69/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-v-69-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:28:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:28:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-v-69-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 67/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-67-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-67-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 39/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-39-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-39-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 64/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-64-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-64-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 65/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-65-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-65-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0605edcbefc5af8b00385f98f0cb7b0e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e584473221e14ebff84af4e06927fddd:0.44164900 1755662489 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.