| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 592/18 | 10.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 297/19 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 26 AS 2431/15 | 02.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 38/20 | 30.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 12 RS 2/14 | 07.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 1/19 | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 KR 740/18 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 91/19 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 10 R 738/14 | 29.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 89/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 27 AS 1122/14 | 23.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 713/15 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 27 AS 2883/13 | 23.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 710/15 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 56 KR 6314/19 | 27.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 81/20 B | 28.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 67/18 | 03.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 14/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 R 148/12 | 21.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 R 1011/14 | 20.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 7 KA 206/17 | 02.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1980/10 | 18.06.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 563/16 | 02.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 569/16 | 01.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 90/18 | 27.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 669/17 WA | 18.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 2391/20 ER | 24.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 23. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 505/20 ER | 04.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 535/20 B ER | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 505/20 ER | 04.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 535/20 B ER | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 21 AS 709/20 ER | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1455/20 B ER | 27.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 207 AS 3221/17 | 19.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1723/19 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 9720/16 | 08.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1255/18 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 895/13 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 511/17 | 09.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1961/13 | 18.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 451/15 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 388/14 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 374/19 | 10.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 1802/12 | 03.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 399/17 | 04.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 297/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-297-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-297-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 38/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-38-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-38-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 1/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-1-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-1-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 91/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-91-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-91-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 89/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-89-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-89-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 713/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-713-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-713-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161558 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 710/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-710-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-710-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 81/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-81-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-81-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 R 148/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-r-148-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-r-148-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 R 1011/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-r-1011-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-r-1011-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KA 206/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ka-206-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ka-206-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 563/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-563-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-563-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 90/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-90-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-90-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 669/17 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-669-17-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-669-17-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 2391/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-2391-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-2391-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AS 505/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-as-505-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-as-505-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 535/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-535-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-535-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1455/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1455-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1455-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127032 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1723/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1723-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1723-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1255/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1255-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1255-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 511/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-511-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-511-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 451/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-451-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-451-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 374/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-374-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-374-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 399/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-399-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-399-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 297/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-297-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-297-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9ec41f2a4d0e6b618b4bafc386810f18 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:393c5e9c28b0f7e203ac13c6837eea80:0.76993300 1751181102 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.