| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1003/05 | 07.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 2. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 242/04 | 25.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 2. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 89/04 | 09.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 2. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 21 AS 168/05 ER | 12.08.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 69/05 ER | 17.10.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 6 AL 428/98 | 11.12.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 104/03 | 21.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 1. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 92/03 | 11.11.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 B 212/03 U | 28.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 1. November 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AL 763/04 ER | 22.04.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 872/05 ER | 10.10.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 692/05 ER | 15.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AS 701/05 ER | 31.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AS 700/05 ER | 18.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 16 AS 350/05 ER | 22.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 1. November 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 EG 16/04 | 28.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 31. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 RA 497/03 | 24.10.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 486/03 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 974/03 | 17.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 241/99 | 25.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 283/03 | 16.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 29 AL 1680/04 | 16.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 247/03 | 31.05.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AS 5/05 ER | 21.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 477/02 | 08.09.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 40 KR 206/05 ER | 19.10.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 87/03 | 09.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 26 AL 663/05 ER | 11.08.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 28. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AS 470/05 ER | 14.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 155/05 AS-ER | 19.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3244 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 1003/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-1003-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-1003-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 242/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-242-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-242-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 69/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-69-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-69-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 104/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-104-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:12:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:12:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-104-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 212/03 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-212-03-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-212-03-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AL 763/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-al-763-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-al-763-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 872/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-872-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-872-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 692/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-692-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-692-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 701/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-701-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-701-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 700/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-700-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-700-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 350/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-350-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-350-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 EG 16/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-eg-16-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:25:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:25:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-eg-16-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 486/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-486-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-486-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 974/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-974-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-974-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 241/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-241-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-241-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 283/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-283-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-283-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AL 1680/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-al-1680-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-al-1680-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 247/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-247-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-247-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 5/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-5-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-5-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 477/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-477-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-477-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 KR 206/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-kr-206-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-kr-206-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 87/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-87-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-87-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AL 663/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-al-663-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-al-663-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 155/05 AS-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-155-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-155-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 1003/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-1003-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-1003-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 31a521cd4d6bd72f691828a9d780e642 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:93b5d9dc150038e82f187096949c902f:0.30315700 1755645329 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.