| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 SO 7/05 ER | 19.09.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 165/05 | 13.09.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 320/04 | 20.04.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 310/01 | 19.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 67/05 ER | 27.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 10 U 69/05 | 18.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 69/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 20 AS 61/05 ER | 06.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 16/05 | 08.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 64/05 ER | 05.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 75/05 ER | 18.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 (38) RJ 122/98 | 09.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 RJ 93/01 | 22.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 23/04 R | 20.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 U 346/01 | 26.06.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 U 108/03 | 08.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 22/04 R | 05.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 4 RJ 1321/97 | 11.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 85/02 | 05.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 29/04 R | 20.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 21 KA 607/00 | 17.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 93/03 | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 42/04 R | 27.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 22 RA 109/02 | 30.06.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 40/03 R | 05.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 3064/00 | 02.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 2404/02 | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/04 R | 12.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Oktober 2005 |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 B 12/05 R | 14.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 12 RA 325/03 | 23.04.2004 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 RA 499/04 | 19.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 6 KR 500/99 | 15.10.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 23/02 | 30.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 AS 36/05 ER | 31.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 20. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 AL 1975/03 ER | 05.12.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 20. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 526/03 | 11.07.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 20. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 291/04 | 09.05.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 20. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 P 309/01 | 14.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 P 47/03 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 19 SO 35/05 ER | 08.02.2005 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 176/05 ER | 01.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3246 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 SO 7/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-so-7-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-so-7-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AL 165/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-al-165-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-al-165-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 320/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-320-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-320-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 310/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-310-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-310-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 67/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-67-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-67-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 69/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-69-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-69-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 61/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-61-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-61-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 16/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-16-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-16-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 64/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-64-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-64-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 75/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-75-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-75-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 23/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-23-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-23-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 22/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-22-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-22-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 29/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-29-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-29-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 42/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-42-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-42-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 40/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-40-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-40-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 11/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-11-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-11-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 B 12/05 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-b-12-05-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-b-12-05-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 499/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-499-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-499-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 23/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-23-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-23-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 36/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-36-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-36-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AL 1975/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-al-1975-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-al-1975-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 526/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-526-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-526-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 291/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-291-04-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-291-04-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 P 47/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-p-47-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-p-47-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 176/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-176-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-176-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 SO 7/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-so-7-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-so-7-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5877d89726a9b7067dd94a8039ff21d1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8634734400e51bb1abb18232b71039ca:0.04396000 1755635350 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.