| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 11 AL 1155/03 | 08.12.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 1276/03 | 09.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 8/5 AL 862/03 | 18.08.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 216/04 | 09.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 1 VS 306/97 | 05.12.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8/5 VS 27/02 | 17.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 KA 2333/02 | 05.11.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 KA 1261/03 | 08.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12/7 AL 1236/01 | 27.02.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 379/02 | 28.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 KA 23/02 | 19.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 436/04 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 KR 187/01 | 28.05.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 73/03 | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 57/03 | 05.04.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 74/04 | 07.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 1 KR 128/01 | 16.01.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 40/04 | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 1 KR 65/03 | 18.02.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 47/04 | 07.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 17 KR 265/03 | 30.04.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 72/04 | 21.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 KR 217/02 | 18.09.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 113/03 | 31.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 17 U 1481/00 | 10.12.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 328/02 | 29.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 15/05 ER | 25.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 B 9/05 AS ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 RJ 2048/04 ER | 24.08.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4/12 B 120/04 RJ | 18.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2876/01 | 25.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 47/02 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 33 SB 1221/02 | 19.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 44/04 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 43 V 164/00 | 20.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 V 22/03 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 34 VS 33/01 | 28.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VS 33/03 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 92/03 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 12 RA 2508/99 | 27.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 RA 60/02 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 SB 1293/00 | 13.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 33/03 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 270/96 | 27.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 119/01 | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 145/00 | 29.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 5/03 | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 5598/02 | 18.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RA 47/03 | 03.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3248 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 1276/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-1276-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-1276-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 216/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-216-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-216-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8/5 VS 27/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-5-vs-27-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-5-vs-27-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 1261/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-1261-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-1261-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 379/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-379-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-379-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 436/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-436-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:19:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:19:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-436-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 73/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-73-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-73-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 74/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-74-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-74-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 40/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-40-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-40-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 47/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-47-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-47-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 72/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-72-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-72-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 113/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-113-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-113-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 328/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-328-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-328-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 15/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-15-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-15-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4/12 B 120/04 RJ [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-12-b-120-04-rj [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-12-b-120-04-rj/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 47/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-47-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-47-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 44/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-44-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-44-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 V 22/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-v-22-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-v-22-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VS 33/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vs-33-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vs-33-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 92/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-92-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-92-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RA 60/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ra-60-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ra-60-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 33/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-33-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-33-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 119/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-119-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-119-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 5/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-5-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-5-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 47/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-47-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-47-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 1276/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-1276-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-1276-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 32d165ff50b4fe48c1117edfcba338f8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:76d7533ebe4c0e6da8ebd51cdd729402:0.22484200 1755628289 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.