| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 1802/12 | 03.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 399/17 | 04.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 8/20 ER | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 268/20 B | 21.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 AY 32/20 | 24.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 7 AS 277/20 ER | 06.03.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 245/20 B ER | 15.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AS 5728/14 | 12.12.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 83/17 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 28 AS 4909/16 | 17.07.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 709/18 | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 17 AS 2529/17 | 25.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 673/20 B | 27.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 AS 4567/14 | 03.08.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 64/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 384/17 | 16.07.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 72/20 B | 30.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 221/17 | 10.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 13/20 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 13 AL 177/16 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 34/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 31 AS 117/14 | 28.08.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 99/18 | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 21 SF 191/19 E | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 879/20 B | 03.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 5 AS 4985/14 | 17.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 2394/16 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 50 SB 3308/16 | 21.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 21. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 40 AS 1017/14 ER | 22.04.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 21. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 SO 225/13 | 17.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 21. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 10 SF 60/17 K | 17.12.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 20. Dezember 2020 | ||
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 3/20 EK U | 24.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Dezember 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 3808/17 | 30.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2819/19 | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 SF 2069/20 RH | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 SF 3593/20 RH | 20.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 801/19 | 15.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2249/20 | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 13 U 269/14 | 26.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 2366/14 | 26.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 302/16 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 227/18 | 29.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 1/20 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. Dezember 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 325 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 325 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 325 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 399/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-399-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-399-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 268/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-268-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-268-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AY 32/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ay-32-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ay-32-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 245/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-245-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-245-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 83/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-83-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-83-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 709/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-709-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-709-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 673/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-673-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-673-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 64/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-64-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-64-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 72/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-72-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-72-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 34/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-34-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-34-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 99/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-99-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-99-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 879/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-879-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-879-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 2394/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-2394-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-2394-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 50 SB 3308/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-50-sb-3308-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-50-sb-3308-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 AS 1017/14 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-as-1017-14-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-as-1017-14-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 225/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-225-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-225-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SF 60/17 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sf-60-17-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sf-60-17-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 3/20 EK U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-3-20-ek-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-3-20-ek-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2819/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2819-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2819-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 3593/20 RH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-3593-20-rh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:24:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:24:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-3593-20-rh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2249/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2249-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2249-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 U 269/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-u-269-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-u-269-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 302/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-302-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-302-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 399/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-399-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-399-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 05d3a4245657d7110c4241e33c78a26e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:49a24c82ec389f62aedaacfa10b0d86e:0.64637600 1751209985 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.