| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 139/98 | 13.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 64/01 | 10.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 37 KR 1373/01 | 20.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 126/04 | 21.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 15 RJ 1308/01 | 26.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 9/04 | 07.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 P 35/03 | 05.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 P 8/03 | 10.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 AS 233/05 ER | 11.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 9/05 ER | 26.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 20/05 ER | 27.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 32/05 ER | 29.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 AS 13/05 ER | 30.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 22 (35) AL 246/04 | 29.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 RJ 54/03 | 19.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 63/05 ER | 06.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 12. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 RA 5112/98*8 | 26.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 89/04 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 RA 1735/01 | 27.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 119/03 | 26.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 RA 4773/98 | 28.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 57/02 | 26.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 RJ 151/01 | 22.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RJ 15/03 | 26.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 1201/03 | 23.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 53/04 | 24.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 46 V 17/03 | 16.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 V 6/04 | 23.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 29 RA 6311/01 | 25.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 49/04 | 22.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 38 RA 5800/03 | 18.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 105/04 | 22.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AL 6818/03 | 05.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 B 35/04 AL | 17.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 AY 13/05 ER | 19.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 AY 3/05 ER | 01.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Oktober 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AS 117/05 ER | 06.06.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 B 353/05 AS PKH | 02.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AS 117/05 ER | 06.06.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 B 332/05 AS ER | 02.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3250 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3250 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3250 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 64/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-64-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-64-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 126/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-126-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-126-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 9/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-9-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-9-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 8/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-8-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:46:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:46:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-8-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 233/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-233-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-233-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 9/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-9-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-9-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 20/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-20-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-20-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 32/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-32-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-32-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 13/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-13-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-13-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 (35) AL 246/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-35-al-246-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-35-al-246-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 RJ 54/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-rj-54-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-rj-54-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 63/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-63-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-63-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 119/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-119-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-119-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 57/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-57-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-57-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 15/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-15-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-15-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 53/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-53-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-53-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 V 6/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-v-6-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-v-6-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 49/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-49-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-49-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 105/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-105-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-105-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 B 35/04 AL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-b-35-04-al [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-b-35-04-al/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AY 13/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ay-13-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ay-13-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AY 3/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ay-3-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ay-3-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 353/05 AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-353-05-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-353-05-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 113284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 B 332/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-b-332-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:19:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:19:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-b-332-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 64/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-64-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:47:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:47:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-64-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9c0e90692562d0d91400ef71344989a3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:868d5bb0fcfb930380cb3f98a813bc5c:0.77873100 1755619947 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.