| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RA 5701/00 | 03.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RA 29/04 | 29.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 161/02 | 13.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 U 8/03 | 25.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KR 1007/01 | 02.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 43/03 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 4 RA 3441/98 | 12.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 41/03 | 10.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 RA 6835/02 | 04.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 85/03 | 10.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AL 2265/01 | 14.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 34/03 | 10.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 46/02 | 30.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 40/02 | 09.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AS 50/05 ER | 11.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 72/05 ER | 14.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 3086/03 | 30.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 74/03 | 05.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 161/04 ER | 24.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 B 40/04 KA ER | 05.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 15 RA 1218/00 | 13.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 70/02 | 20.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 46/03 | 10.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 RA 3359/01 | 11.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 137/03 | 03.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 RA 3173/02 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 165/03 | 15.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. September 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 12 KA 2708/99 | 14.02.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 406/01 | 26.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 81/03 R | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 2 KR 827/01 | 16.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 24/02 | 20.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/03 R | 10.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | 02.11.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 19/04 R | 20.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 201/01 LW | 11.03.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 35/03 LW | 13.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/04 R | 12.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 30/02 | 26.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 185/02 | 08.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/04 R | 05.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 U 1231/03 | 05.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 4062/03 | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/04 R | 05.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 13 RA 5572/04 | 29.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 23. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 59/04 | 12.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 23. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 59/04 | 12.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 23. September 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 3 RJ 606/01 | 23.04.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KR 780/02 | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 22. September 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3254 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3254 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3254 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 29/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-29-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-29-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 U 8/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-u-8-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-u-8-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 43/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-43-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-43-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 41/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-41-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-41-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 85/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-85-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-85-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 34/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-34-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-34-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 40/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-40-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-40-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 50/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-50-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-50-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 72/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-72-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-72-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 74/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-74-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-74-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 40/04 KA ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-40-04-ka-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-40-04-ka-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 70/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-70-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-70-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 46/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-46-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-46-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 137/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-137-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-137-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 165/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-165-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-165-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 81/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-81-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-81-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 25/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-25-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-25-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 19/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-19-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-19-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:14:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:14:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 RA 5572/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ra-5572-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ra-5572-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 59/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-59-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-59-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 59/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-59-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-59-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 780/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-780-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:11:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:11:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-780-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 29/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-29-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:56:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:56:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-29-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e3e382863a33cb3d80ff1370efb0f0c0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9c75f02b8f68b44cc8ca4cbd31a37c0d:0.12035700 1755604353 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.